mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Calibration of Machine Reading Systems at Scale

arXiv 2203.10623 ↗First posted 20 Mar 2022cs.CL cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In typical machine learning systems, an estimate of the probability of the prediction is used to assess the system's confidence in the prediction. This confidence measure is usually uncalibrated; i.e. the system's confidence in the prediction does not match the true probability of the predicted output. In this paper, we present an investigation into calibrating open setting machine reading systems such as open-domain question answering and claim verification systems. We show that calibrating such complex systems which contain discrete retrieval and deep reading components is challenging and current calibration techniques fail to scale to these settings. We propose simple extensions to existing calibration approaches that allows us to adapt them to these settings. Our experimental results reveal that the approach works well, and can be useful to selectively predict answers when question answering systems are posed with unanswerable or out-of-the-training distribution questions.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2022.

Builds on

30 of 39 references.

References · 30

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  2. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  3. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  4. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  5. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
  6. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
  7. 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,708
  8. 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,362
  9. 2020Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 1,203
  10. 2016The Concrete Distribution: A Continuous Relaxation of Discrete Random Variablescited by 1,135
  11. 2019How Can We Know What Language Models Know?cited by 953
  12. 2017Reading Wikipedia to Answer Open-Domain Questionscited by 777
18 more
  1. 2019Latent Retrieval for Weakly Supervised Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 691
  2. 2020Calibration of Pre-trained Transformerscited by 307
  3. 2020Selective Question Answering under Domain Shiftcited by 228
  4. 2020Distilling Knowledge from Reader to Retriever for Question Answeringcited by 226
  5. 2021End-to-End Training of Multi-Document Reader and Retriever for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 133
  6. 2017Simple and Effective Multi-Paragraph Reading Comprehensioncited by 120
  7. 2018The Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER) Shared Taskcited by 108
  8. 2019Fine-grained Fact Verification with Kernel Graph Attention Networkcited by 105
  9. 2018Neural Nearest Neighbors Networkscited by 98
  10. 2018Quantifying Uncertainties in Natural Language Processing Taskscited by 79
  11. 2019Reparameterizable Subset Sampling via Continuous Relaxationscited by 69
  12. 2019Calibration of Encoder Decoder Models for Neural Machine Translationcited by 67
  13. 2018UKP-Athene: Multi-Sentence Textual Entailment for Claim Verificationcited by 60
  14. 2020Challenges in Information-Seeking QA: Unanswerable Questions and Paragraph Retrievalcited by 44
  15. 2019Improving Back-Translation with Uncertainty-based Confidence Estimationcited by 34
  16. 2018Confidence Modeling for Neural Semantic Parsingcited by 33
  17. 2020Calibrating Structured Output Predictors for Natural Language Processingcited by 17
  18. 2019Controlling Risk of Web Question Answeringcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 4.

11 papers.