Inferring topological transitions in pattern-forming processes with self-supervised learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The identification and classification of transitions in topological and microstructural regimes in pattern-forming processes are critical for understanding and fabricating microstructurally precise novel materials in many application domains. Unfortunately, relevant microstructure transitions may depend on process parameters in subtle and complex ways that are not captured by the classic theory of phase transition. While supervised machine learning methods may be useful for identifying transition regimes, they need labels which require prior knowledge of order parameters or relevant structures describing these transitions. Motivated by the universality principle for dynamical systems, we instead use a self-supervised approach to solve the inverse problem of predicting process parameters from observed microstructures using neural networks. This approach does not require predefined, labeled data about the different classes of microstructural patterns or about the target task of predicting microstructure transitions. We show that the difficulty of performing the inverse-problem prediction task is related to the goal of discovering microstructure regimes, because qualitative changes in microstructural patterns correspond to changes in uncertainty predictions for our self-supervised problem. We demonstrate the value of our approach by automatically discovering transitions in microstructural regimes in two distinct pattern-forming processes: the spinodal decomposition of a two-phase mixture and the formation of concentration modulations of binary alloys during physical vapor deposition of thin films. This approach opens a promising path forward for discovering and understanding unseen or hard-to-discern transition regimes, and ultimately for controlling complex pattern-forming processes.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2022.
Builds on
15 of 72 references.
References · 15
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
- 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,818
- 2021EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Trainingcited by 1,127
- 2014One weird trick for parallelizing convolutional neural networkscited by 264
- 2020Understanding the Role of Individual Units in a Deep Neural Networkcited by 254
- 2017Concrete Dropoutcited by 227
- 2017Multi-task Self-Supervised Visual Learningcited by 200
- 2020Triple descent and the two kinds of overfitting: Where & why do they appear?cited by 64
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.