mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Closer Look at Debiased Temporal Sentence Grounding in Videos: Dataset, Metric, and Approach

arXiv 2203.05243 ↗First posted 10 Mar 2022cs.CV cs.CL cs.MMcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Temporal Sentence Grounding in Videos (TSGV), which aims to ground a natural language sentence in an untrimmed video, has drawn widespread attention over the past few years. However, recent studies have found that current benchmark datasets may have obvious moment annotation biases, enabling several simple baselines even without training to achieve SOTA performance. In this paper, we take a closer look at existing evaluation protocols, and find both the prevailing dataset and evaluation metrics are the devils that lead to untrustworthy benchmarking. Therefore, we propose to re-organize the two widely-used datasets, making the ground-truth moment distributions different in the training and test splits, i.e., out-of-distribution (OOD) test. Meanwhile, we introduce a new evaluation metric "dR@n,IoU@m" that discounts the basic recall scores to alleviate the inflating evaluation caused by biased datasets. New benchmarking results indicate that our proposed evaluation protocols can better monitor the research progress. Furthermore, we propose a novel causality-based Multi-branch Deconfounding Debiasing (MDD) framework for unbiased moment prediction. Specifically, we design a multi-branch deconfounder to eliminate the effects caused by multiple confounders with causal intervention. In order to help the model better align the semantics between sentence queries and video moments, we enhance the representations during feature encoding. Specifically, for textual information, the query is parsed into several verb-centered phrases to obtain a more fine-grained textual feature. For visual information, the positional information has been decomposed from moment features to enhance representations of moments with diverse locations. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our proposed approach can achieve competitive results among existing SOTA approaches and outperform the base model with great gains.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2022.

Builds on

42 of 62 references.

References · 42

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,259
  4. 2017Dense-Captioning Events in Videoscited by 789
  5. 2017Localizing Moments in Video with Natural Languagecited by 660
  6. 2017TALL: Temporal Activity Localization via Language Querycited by 581
  7. 2016Hollywood in Homes: Crowdsourcing Data Collection for Activity Understandingcited by 535
  8. 2020Unbiased Scene Graph Generation from Biased Trainingcited by 355
  9. 2017Don't Just Assume; Look and Answer: Overcoming Priors for Visual Question Answeringcited by 337
  10. 2019Learning 2D Temporal Adjacent Networks for Moment Localization with Natural Languagecited by 283
  11. 2019Don't Take the Easy Way Out: Ensemble Based Methods for Avoiding Known Dataset Biasescited by 279
  12. 2020Counterfactual VQA: A Cause-Effect Look at Language Biascited by 266
30 more
  1. 2019RUBi: Reducing Unimodal Biases in Visual Question Answeringcited by 183
  2. 2020Dense Regression Network for Video Groundingcited by 176
  3. 2018To Find Where You Talk: Temporal Sentence Localization in Video with Attention Based Location Regressioncited by 157
  4. 2020Counterfactual Samples Synthesizing for Robust Visual Question Answeringcited by 153
  5. 2018MAN: Moment Alignment Network for Natural Language Moment Retrieval via Iterative Graph Adjustmentcited by 145
  6. 2019Semantic Conditioned Dynamic Modulation for Temporal Sentence Grounding in Videoscited by 135
  7. 2018Multilevel Language and Vision Integration for Text-to-Clip Retrievalcited by 128
  8. 2018Overcoming Language Priors in Visual Question Answering with Adversarial Regularizationcited by 104
  9. 2021Interventional Video Grounding with Dual Contrastive Learningcited by 94
  10. 2021Boundary Proposal Network for Two-Stage Natural Language Video Localizationcited by 88
  11. 2019Weakly Supervised Video Moment Retrieval From Text Queriescited by 85
  12. 2018MAC: Mining Activity Concepts for Language-based Temporal Localizationcited by 84
  13. 2021Deconfounded Video Moment Retrieval with Causal Interventioncited by 84
  14. 2019Cross-Modal Interaction Networks for Query-Based Moment Retrieval in Videoscited by 79
  15. 2020Deconfounded Image Captioning: A Causal Retrospectcited by 65
  16. 2020MUTANT: A Training Paradigm for Out-of-Distribution Generalization in Visual Question Answeringcited by 63
  17. 2019Read, Watch, and Move: Reinforcement Learning for Temporally Grounding Natural Language Descriptions in Videoscited by 60
  18. 2018Weakly Supervised Dense Event Captioning in Videoscited by 58
  19. 2020Uncovering Hidden Challenges in Query-Based Video Moment Retrievalcited by 58
  20. 2021On Pursuit of Designing Multi-modal Transformer for Video Groundingcited by 54
  21. 2020Tree-Structured Policy based Progressive Reinforcement Learning for Temporally Language Grounding in Videocited by 47
  22. 2021A Closer Look at Temporal Sentence Grounding in Videos: Dataset and Metriccited by 42
  23. 2021Cross-Sentence Temporal and Semantic Relations in Video Activity Localisationcited by 39
  24. 2019WSLLN: Weakly Supervised Natural Language Localization Networkscited by 36
  25. 2019Tripping through time: Efficient Localization of Activities in Videoscited by 33
  26. 2020Weakly-Supervised Multi-Level Attentional Reconstruction Network for Grounding Textual Queries in Videoscited by 31
  27. 2021Embracing Uncertainty: Decoupling and De-bias for Robust Temporal Groundingcited by 29
  28. 2021Natural Language Video Localization with Learnable Moment Proposalscited by 27
  29. 2019Adversarial Regularization for Visual Question Answering: Strengths, Shortcomings, and Side Effectscited by 25
  30. 2021Counterfactual Samples Synthesizing and Training for Robust Visual Question Answeringcited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

11 papers.