SAGE: Generating Symbolic Goals for Myopic Models in Deep Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Model-based reinforcement learning algorithms are typically more sample efficient than their model-free counterparts, especially in sparse reward problems. Unfortunately, many interesting domains are too complex to specify the complete models required by traditional model-based approaches. Learning a model takes a large number of environment samples, and may not capture critical information if the environment is hard to explore. If we could specify an incomplete model and allow the agent to learn how best to use it, we could take advantage of our partial understanding of many domains. Existing hybrid planning and learning systems which address this problem often impose highly restrictive assumptions on the sorts of models which can be used, limiting their applicability to a wide range of domains. In this work we propose SAGE, an algorithm combining learning and planning to exploit a previously unusable class of incomplete models. This combines the strengths of symbolic planning and neural learning approaches in a novel way that outperforms competing methods on variations of taxi world and Minecraft.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2022.
Builds on
21 of 44 references.
References · 21
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2019Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent Imaginationcited by 1,598
- 2019Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 1,327
- 2018Learning Latent Dynamics for Planning from Pixelscited by 1,221
- 2020Mastering Atari with Discrete World Modelscited by 990
- 2018Recurrent World Models Facilitate Policy Evolutioncited by 761
- 2018Data-Efficient Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 436
- 2017FeUdal Networks for Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 328
- 2016Hierarchical Deep Reinforcement Learning: Integrating Temporal Abstraction and Intrinsic Motivationcited by 282
- 2016Modular Multitask Reinforcement Learning with Policy Sketchescited by 200
- 2017Value Prediction Networkcited by 117
9 more
- 2018SDRL: Interpretable and Data-efficient Deep Reinforcement Learning Leveraging Symbolic Planningcited by 77
- 2019Why Does Hierarchy (Sometimes) Work So Well in Reinforcement Learning?cited by 66
- 2019Hybrid Actor-Critic Reinforcement Learning in Parameterized Action Spacecited by 53
- 2018PEORL: Integrating Symbolic Planning and Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning for Robust Decision-Makingcited by 51
- 2019Sub-policy Adaptation for Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 47
- 2018Combined Reinforcement Learning via Abstract Representationscited by 37
- 2019What Should I Do Now? Marrying Reinforcement Learning and Symbolic Planningcited by 9
- 2017Deep Abstract Q-Networkscited by 6
- 2019Planning with Abstract Learned Models While Learning Transferable Subtaskscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.