mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Model-free feature selection to facilitate automatic discovery of divergent subgroups in tabular data

arXiv 2203.04386 ↗First posted 8 Mar 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.ITcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data-centric AI encourages the need of cleaning and understanding of data in order to achieve trustworthy AI. Existing technologies, such as AutoML, make it easier to design and train models automatically, but there is a lack of a similar level of capabilities to extract data-centric insights. Manual stratification of tabular data per a feature (e.g., gender) is limited to scale up for higher feature dimension, which could be addressed using automatic discovery of divergent subgroups. Nonetheless, these automatic discovery techniques often search across potentially exponential combinations of features that could be simplified using a preceding feature selection step. Existing feature selection techniques for tabular data often involve fitting a particular model in order to select important features. However, such model-based selection is prone to model-bias and spurious correlations in addition to requiring extra resource to design, fine-tune and train a model. In this paper, we propose a model-free and sparsity-based automatic feature selection (SAFS) framework to facilitate automatic discovery of divergent subgroups. Different from filter-based selection techniques, we exploit the sparsity of objective measures among feature values to rank and select features. We validated SAFS across two publicly available datasets (MIMIC-III and Allstate Claims) and compared it with six existing feature selection methods. SAFS achieves a reduction of feature selection time by a factor of 81x and 104x, averaged cross the existing methods in the MIMIC-III and Claims datasets respectively. SAFS-selected features are also shown to achieve competitive detection performance, e.g., 18.3% of features selected by SAFS in the Claims dataset detected divergent samples similar to those detected by using the whole features with a Jaccard similarity of 0.95 but with a 16x reduction in detection time.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2022.

Builds on

12 of 39 references.

References · 12

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  2. 2020A Unifying Review of Deep and Shallow Anomaly Detectioncited by 425
  3. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 413
  4. 2018Detecting Spacecraft Anomalies Using LSTMs and Nonparametric Dynamic Thresholdingcited by 410
  5. 2019AutoML: A Survey of the State-of-the-Artcited by 390
  6. 2018CatBoost: gradient boosting with categorical features supportcited by 208
  7. 2018Automated Data Slicing for Model Validation:A Big data - AI Integration Approachcited by 70
  8. 2013One-Class Classification: Taxonomy of Study and Review of Techniquescited by 68
  9. 2015A Review of Feature Selection Methods Based on Mutual Informationcited by 67
  10. 2019Statistical Analysis of Nearest Neighbor Methods for Anomaly Detectioncited by 29
  11. 2021Out-of-Distribution Detection in Dermatology using Input Perturbation and Subset Scanningcited by 11
  12. 2021Automated Supervised Feature Selection for Differentiated Patterns of Carecited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.