mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Out-of-Distribution Detection in Dermatology using Input Perturbation and Subset Scanning

arXiv 2105.11160 ↗First posted 24 May 2021cs.CV cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in deep learning have led to breakthroughs in the development of automated skin disease classification. As we observe an increasing interest in these models in the dermatology space, it is crucial to address aspects such as the robustness towards input data distribution shifts. Current skin disease models could make incorrect inferences for test samples from different hardware devices and clinical settings or unknown disease samples, which are out-of-distribution (OOD) from the training samples. To this end, we propose a simple yet effective approach that detect these OOD samples prior to making any decision. The detection is performed via scanning in the latent space representation (e.g., activations of the inner layers of any pre-trained skin disease classifier). The input samples could also perturbed to maximise divergence of OOD samples. We validate our ODD detection approach in two use cases: 1) identify samples collected from different protocols, and 2) detect samples from unknown disease classes. Additionally, we evaluate the performance of the proposed approach and compare it with other state-of-the-art methods. Furthermore, data-driven dermatology applications may deepen the disparity in clinical care across racial and ethnic groups since most datasets are reported to suffer from bias in skin tone distribution. Therefore, we also evaluate the fairness of these OOD detection methods across different skin tones. Our experiments resulted in competitive performance across multiple datasets in detecting OOD samples, which could be used (in the future) to design more effective transfer learning techniques prior to inferring on these samples.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2021.

Builds on

14 of 38 references.

References · 14

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  3. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  4. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  5. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
  6. 2019Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection 2018: A Challenge Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)cited by 657
  7. 2017Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection: A Challenge at the 2017 International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)cited by 549
  8. 2019BCN20000: Dermoscopic Lesions in the Wildcited by 224
  9. 2016Skin Lesion Analysis toward Melanoma Detection: A Challenge at the International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2016, hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)cited by 197
  10. 2020Secure and Robust Machine Learning for Healthcare: A Surveycited by 77
  11. 2019Detecting Out-of-Distribution Examples with In-distribution Examples and Gram Matricescited by 32
  12. 2019Estimating Skin Tone and Effects on Classification Performance in Dermatology Datasetscited by 29
2 more
  1. 2018Skin Lesion Diagnosis using Ensembles, Unscaled Multi-Crop Evaluation and Loss Weightingcited by 6
  2. 2019Skin cancer detection based on deep learning and entropy to detect outlier samplescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 5; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

11 papers.