An Efficient Subpopulation-based Membership Inference Attack
On the map: LLM safety and security → Membership inference attacks
Abstract (arXiv)
Membership inference attacks allow a malicious entity to predict whether a sample is used during training of a victim model or not. State-of-the-art membership inference attacks have shown to achieve good accuracy which poses a great privacy threat. However, majority of SOTA attacks require training dozens to hundreds of shadow models to accurately infer membership. This huge computation cost raises questions about practicality of these attacks on deep models. In this paper, we introduce a fundamentally different MI attack approach which obviates the need to train hundreds of shadow models. Simply put, we compare the victim model output on the target sample versus the samples from the same subpopulation (i.e., semantically similar samples), instead of comparing it with the output of hundreds of shadow models. The intuition is that the model response should not be significantly different between the target sample and its subpopulation if it was not a training sample. In cases where subpopulation samples are not available to the attacker, we show that training only a single generative model can fulfill the requirement. Hence, we achieve the state-of-the-art membership inference accuracy while significantly reducing the training computation cost.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Membership inference attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 9 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2022.
Builds on
9 of 15 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2021On the Importance of Difficulty Calibration in Membership Inference Attacks15 Nov
- 2021Accuracy-Privacy Trade-off in Deep Ensemble: A Membership Inference Perspective12 May
Other references · 7
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
- 2016Adversarial Feature Learningcited by 350
- 2019White-box vs Black-box: Bayes Optimal Strategies for Membership Inferencecited by 265
- 2018Visual Interpretability for Deep Learning: a Surveycited by 155
- 2020Revisiting Membership Inference Under Realistic Assumptionscited by 108
- 2019Deep Music Analogy Via Latent Representation Disentanglementcited by 31
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022On the Discredibility of Membership Inference Attackscited by 3
- 2023Why Train More? Effective and Efficient Membership Inference via Memorizationcited by 2
- 2023Membership inference attack with relative decision boundary distancecited by 1
- 2025Black-Box Privacy Attacks on Shared Representations in Multitask Learningcited by 0
- 2025Black-Box Privacy Attacks on Shared Representations in Multitask Learning19 Jun 2025
- 2023Why Train More? Effective and Efficient Membership Inference via Memorization12 Oct 2023
- 2023Membership inference attack with relative decision boundary distance7 Jun 2023
- 2022On the Discredibility of Membership Inference Attacks6 Dec 2022