mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning the nonlinear dynamics of soft mechanical metamaterials with graph networks

arXiv 2202.13775 ↗First posted 24 Feb 2022cs.CE cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The dynamics of soft mechanical metamaterials provides opportunities for many exciting engineering applications. Previous studies often use discrete systems, composed of rigid elements and nonlinear springs, to model the nonlinear dynamic responses of the continuum metamaterials. Yet it remains a challenge to accurately construct such systems based on the geometry of the building blocks of the metamaterial. In this work, we propose a machine learning approach to address this challenge. A metamaterial graph network (MGN) is used to represent the discrete system, where the nodal features contain the positions and orientations the rigid elements, and the edge update functions describe the mechanics of the nonlinear springs. We use Gaussian process regression as the surrogate model to characterize the elastic energy of the nonlinear springs as a function of the relative positions and orientations of the connected rigid elements. The optimal model can be obtained by "learning" from the data generated via finite element calculation over the corresponding building block of the continuum metamaterial. Then, we deploy the optimal model to the network so that the dynamics of the metamaterial at the structural scale can be studied. We verify the accuracy of our machine learning approach against several representative numerical examples. In these examples, the proposed approach can significantly reduce the computational cost when compared to direct numerical simulation while reaching comparable accuracy. Moreover, defects and spatial inhomogeneities can be easily incorporated into our approach, which can be useful for the rational design of soft mechanical metamaterials.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2022.

Builds on

14 of 71 references.

References · 14

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,487
  3. 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,360
  4. 2020Learning to Simulate Complex Physics with Graph Networkscited by 880
  5. 2020Learning Mesh-Based Simulation with Graph Networkscited by 868
  6. 2015Convolutional Networks on Graphs for Learning Molecular Fingerprintscited by 754
  7. 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 712
  8. 2016Interaction Networks for Learning about Objects, Relations and Physicscited by 509
  9. 2021Machine learning accelerated computational fluid dynamicscited by 471
  10. 2017A simple neural network module for relational reasoningcited by 346
  11. 2018Graph networks as learnable physics engines for inference and controlcited by 244
  12. 2016A Compositional Object-Based Approach to Learning Physical Dynamicscited by 119
2 more
  1. 2020Geometric deep learning for computational mechanics Part I: Anisotropic Hyperelasticitycited by 49
  2. 2022A deep learning energy method for hyperelasticity and viscoelasticitycited by 20

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 2.

7 papers.