mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improving Lexical Embeddings for Robust Question Answering

arXiv 2202.13636 ↗First posted 28 Feb 2022cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent techniques in Question Answering (QA) have gained remarkable performance improvement with some QA models even surpassed human performance. However, the ability of these models in truly understanding the language still remains dubious and the models are revealing limitations when facing adversarial examples. To strengthen the robustness of QA models and their generalization ability, we propose a representation Enhancement via Semantic and Context constraints (ESC) approach to improve the robustness of lexical embeddings. Specifically, we insert perturbations with semantic constraints and train enhanced contextual representations via a context-constraint loss to better distinguish the context clues for the correct answer. Experimental results show that our approach gains significant robustness improvement on four adversarial test sets.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Feb 2022.

Builds on

25 of 32 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  5. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  6. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  7. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
  8. 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,538
  9. 2016The LAMBADA dataset: Word prediction requiring a broad discourse contextcited by 960
  10. 2017Reading Wikipedia to Answer Open-Domain Questionscited by 777
  11. 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 568
  12. 2018Generating Natural Language Adversarial Examplescited by 422
13 more
  1. 2017Synthetic and Natural Noise Both Break Neural Machine Translationcited by 304
  2. 2018Adversarial Example Generation with Syntactically Controlled Paraphrase Networkscited by 282
  3. 2016Adversarial Training Methods for Semi-Supervised Text Classificationcited by 280
  4. 2016Bidirectional Attention Flow for Machine Comprehensioncited by 278
  5. 2020InfoBERT: Improving Robustness of Language Models from An Information Theoretic Perspectivecited by 92
  6. 2018Robust Machine Comprehension Models via Adversarial Trainingcited by 44
  7. 2018Towards Robust Neural Machine Translationcited by 35
  8. 2017FusionNet: Fusing via Fully-Aware Attention with Application to Machine Comprehensioncited by 22
  9. 2021Dynamic Semantic Graph Construction and Reasoning for Explainable Multi-hop Science Question Answeringcited by 17
  10. 2019QAInfomax: Learning Robust Question Answering System by Mutual Information Maximizationcited by 9
  11. 2019Robust Reading Comprehension with Linguistic Constraints via Posterior Regularizationcited by 8
  12. 2019Improving Machine Reading Comprehension via Adversarial Trainingcited by 7
  13. 2021Addressing the Vulnerability of NMT in Input Perturbationscited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.