An initial alignment between neural network and target is needed for gradient descent to learn
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper introduces the notion of ``Initial Alignment'' (INAL) between a neural network at initialization and a target function. It is proved that if a network and a Boolean target function do not have a noticeable INAL, then noisy gradient descent on a fully connected network with normalized i.i.d. initialization will not learn in polynomial time. Thus a certain amount of knowledge about the target (measured by the INAL) is needed in the architecture design. This also provides an answer to an open problem posed in [AS20]. The results are based on deriving lower-bounds for descent algorithms on symmetric neural networks without explicit knowledge of the target function beyond its INAL.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2022.
Builds on
7 of 17 references.
References · 7
- 2018An Intriguing Failing of Convolutional Neural Networks and the CoordConv Solutioncited by 302
- 2021Quantifying the Benefit of Using Differentiable Learning over Tangent Kernelscited by 41
- 2021On the Power of Differentiable Learning versus PAC and SQ Learningcited by 27
- 2019Is Deeper Better only when Shallow is Good?cited by 24
- 2020Poly-time universality and limitations of deep learningcited by 23
- 2020Computational Separation Between Convolutional and Fully-Connected Networkscited by 19
- 2021A cautionary tale on fitting decision trees to data from additive models: generalization lower boundscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 5; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
12 papers.
- 2022Hidden Progress in Deep Learning: SGD Learns Parities Near the Computational Limitcited by 184
- 2023SGD learning on neural networks: leap complexity and saddle-to-saddle dynamicscited by 142
- 2022Gradient flow dynamics of shallow ReLU networks for square loss and orthogonal inputscited by 74
- 2023Generalization on the Unseen, Logic Reasoning and Degree Curriculumcited by 73
- 2024How Far Can Transformers Reason? The Globality Barrier and Inductive Scratchpadcited by 35
- 2023When can transformers reason with abstract symbols?cited by 23
- 2023Provable Advantage of Curriculum Learning on Parity Targets with Mixed Inputscited by 22
- 2023A Mathematical Model for Curriculum Learning for Paritiescited by 19
- 2022Learning to Reason with Neural Networks: Generalization, Unseen Data and Boolean Measurescited by 17
- 2022On the non-universality of deep learning: quantifying the cost of symmetrycited by 17
- 2025How Does Preconditioning Guide Feature Learning in Deep Neural Networks?cited by 0
- 2026Pattern Formation in Transformerscited by 0
- 2026Pattern Formation in Transformers29 Sep 2026
- 2025How Does Preconditioning Guide Feature Learning in Deep Neural Networks?30 Sep 2025
- 2024How Far Can Transformers Reason? The Globality Barrier and Inductive Scratchpad10 Jun 2024
- 2023When can transformers reason with abstract symbols?15 Oct 2023
- 2023Provable Advantage of Curriculum Learning on Parity Targets with Mixed Inputs29 Jun 2023
- 2023SGD learning on neural networks: leap complexity and saddle-to-saddle dynamics21 Feb 2023
- 2023A Mathematical Model for Curriculum Learning for Parities31 Jan 2023
- 2023Generalization on the Unseen, Logic Reasoning and Degree Curriculum30 Jan 2023
- 2022On the non-universality of deep learning: quantifying the cost of symmetry5 Aug 2022
- 2022Hidden Progress in Deep Learning: SGD Learns Parities Near the Computational Limit18 Jul 2022
- 2022Gradient flow dynamics of shallow ReLU networks for square loss and orthogonal inputs2 Jun 2022
- 2022Learning to Reason with Neural Networks: Generalization, Unseen Data and Boolean Measures26 May 2022