mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning to Liquidate Forex: Optimal Stopping via Adaptive Top-K Regression

arXiv 2202.12578 ↗First posted 25 Feb 2022cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider learning a trading agent acting on behalf of the treasury of a firm earning revenue in a foreign currency (FC) and incurring expenses in the home currency (HC). The goal of the agent is to maximize the expected HC at the end of the trading episode by deciding to hold or sell the FC at each time step in the trading episode. We pose this as an optimization problem, and consider a broad spectrum of approaches with the learning component ranging from supervised to imitation to reinforcement learning. We observe that most of the approaches considered struggle to improve upon simple heuristic baselines. We identify two key aspects of the problem that render standard solutions ineffective - i) while good forecasts of future FX rates can be highly effective in guiding good decisions, forecasting FX rates is difficult, and erroneous estimates tend to degrade the performance of trading agents instead of improving it, ii) the inherent non-stationary nature of FX rates renders a fixed decision-threshold highly ineffective. To address these problems, we propose a novel supervised learning approach that learns to forecast the top-K future FX rates instead of forecasting all the future FX rates, and bases the hold-versus-sell decision on the forecasts (e.g. hold if future FX rate is higher than current FX rate, sell otherwise). Furthermore, to handle the non-stationarity in the FX rates data which poses challenges to the i.i.d. assumption in supervised learning methods, we propose to adaptively learn decision-thresholds based on recent historical episodes. Through extensive empirical evaluation, we show that our approach is the only approach which is able to consistently improve upon a simple heuristic baseline. Further experiments show the inefficacy of state-of-the-art statistical and deep-learning-based forecasting methods as they degrade the performance of the trading agent.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2022.

Builds on

8 of 26 references.

References · 8

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,745
  3. 2018Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning without Explorationcited by 1,241
  4. 2018CatBoost: gradient boosting with categorical features supportcited by 208
  5. 2019Benchmarking Batch Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithmscited by 111
  6. 2021Optimal Stopping via Randomized Neural Networkscited by 28
  7. 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning for Optimal Stopping with Application in Financial Engineeringcited by 6
  8. 2021Forecasting Market Prices using DL with Data Augmentation and Meta-learning: ARIMA still wins!cited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.