mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Compositional Generalization Requires Compositional Parsers

arXiv 2202.11937 ↗First posted 24 Feb 2022cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A rapidly growing body of research on compositional generalization investigates the ability of a semantic parser to dynamically recombine linguistic elements seen in training into unseen sequences. We present a systematic comparison of sequence-to-sequence models and models guided by compositional principles on the recent COGS corpus (Kim and Linzen, 2020). Though seq2seq models can perform well on lexical tasks, they perform with near-zero accuracy on structural generalization tasks that require novel syntactic structures; this holds true even when they are trained to predict syntax instead of semantics. In contrast, compositional models achieve near-perfect accuracy on structural generalization; we present new results confirming this from the AM parser (Groschwitz et al., 2021). Our findings show structural generalization is a key measure of compositional generalization and requires models that are aware of complex structure.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2022.

Builds on

27 of 43 references.

References · 27

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  4. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  5. 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,046
  6. 2016Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependenciescited by 350
  7. 2019Measuring Compositional Generalization: A Comprehensive Method on Realistic Datacited by 280
  8. 2020COGS: A Compositional Generalization Challenge Based on Semantic Interpretationcited by 260
  9. 2018Constituency Parsing with a Self-Attentive Encodercited by 196
  10. 2020Compositional Generalization and Natural Language Variation: Can a Semantic Parsing Approach Handle Both?cited by 147
  11. 2021The Devil is in the Detail: Simple Tricks Improve Systematic Generalization of Transformerscited by 117
  12. 2020Span-based Semantic Parsing for Compositional Generalizationcited by 77
15 more
  1. 2020Does syntax need to grow on trees? Sources of hierarchical inductive bias in sequence-to-sequence networkscited by 72
  2. 2021Meta-Learning to Compositionally Generalizecited by 62
  3. 2016Simple and Accurate Dependency Parsing Using Bidirectional LSTM Feature Representationscited by 55
  4. 2018Deep RNNs Encode Soft Hierarchical Syntaxcited by 34
  5. 2021Learning Algebraic Recombination for Compositional Generalizationcited by 31
  6. 2021Disentangled Sequence to Sequence Learning for Compositional Generalizationcited by 30
  7. 2021Lexicon Learning for Few-Shot Neural Sequence Modelingcited by 28
  8. 2021Are Pre-trained Convolutions Better than Pre-trained Transformers?cited by 27
  9. 2018AMR Dependency Parsing with a Typed Semantic Algebracited by 17
  10. 2019Compositional Semantic Parsing Across Graphbankscited by 15
  11. 2017Modeling Source Syntax for Neural Machine Translationcited by 12
  12. 2021Improving Compositional Generalization in Classification Tasks via Structure Annotationscited by 12
  13. 2020Fast semantic parsing with well-typedness guaranteescited by 10
  14. 2021Compositional generalization in semantic parsing with pretrained transformerscited by 5
  15. 2021Learning compositional structures for semantic graph parsingcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2.

2 papers.