Modeling Source Syntax for Neural Machine Translation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Even though a linguistics-free sequence to sequence model in neural machine translation (NMT) has certain capability of implicitly learning syntactic information of source sentences, this paper shows that source syntax can be explicitly incorporated into NMT effectively to provide further improvements. Specifically, we linearize parse trees of source sentences to obtain structural label sequences. On the basis, we propose three different sorts of encoders to incorporate source syntax into NMT: 1) Parallel RNN encoder that learns word and label annotation vectors parallelly; 2) Hierarchical RNN encoder that learns word and label annotation vectors in a two-level hierarchy; and 3) Mixed RNN encoder that stitchingly learns word and label annotation vectors over sequences where words and labels are mixed. Experimentation on Chinese-to-English translation demonstrates that all the three proposed syntactic encoders are able to improve translation accuracy. It is interesting to note that the simplest RNN encoder, i.e., Mixed RNN encoder yields the best performance with an significant improvement of 1.4 BLEU points. Moreover, an in-depth analysis from several perspectives is provided to reveal how source syntax benefits NMT.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 May 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
12 papers.
- 2021Uncertainty-Aware Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 35
- 2021Towards More Fine-grained and Reliable NLP Performance Predictioncited by 26
- 2022Structural generalization is hard for sequence-to-sequence modelscited by 24
- 2021Alternative Input Signals Ease Transfer in Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 14
- 2023Explicit Syntactic Guidance for Neural Text Generationcited by 8
- 2024Low-resource neural machine translation with morphological modelingcited by 7
- 2021MirrorAlign: A Super Lightweight Unsupervised Word Alignment Model via Cross-Lingual Contrastive Learningcited by 4
- 2022Compositional Generalization Requires Compositional Parserscited by 2
- 2021Enhancing the Transformer Decoder with Transition-based Syntaxcited by 1
- 2021Deps-SAN: Neural Machine Translation with Dependency-Scaled Self-Attention Networkcited by 1
- 2022Unsupervised and Few-shot Parsing from Pretrained Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Top-down string-to-dependency Neural Machine Translationcited by 0
- 2026Top-down string-to-dependency Neural Machine Translation30 Mar 2026
- 2024Low-resource neural machine translation with morphological modeling3 Apr 2024
- 2023Explicit Syntactic Guidance for Neural Text Generation20 Jun 2023
- 2022Structural generalization is hard for sequence-to-sequence models24 Oct 2022
- 2022Unsupervised and Few-shot Parsing from Pretrained Language Models10 Jun 2022
- 2022Compositional Generalization Requires Compositional Parsers24 Feb 2022
- 2021Deps-SAN: Neural Machine Translation with Dependency-Scaled Self-Attention Network23 Nov 2021
- 2021Alternative Input Signals Ease Transfer in Multilingual Machine Translation15 Oct 2021
- 2021Uncertainty-Aware Machine Translation Evaluation13 Sep 2021
- 2021Towards More Fine-grained and Reliable NLP Performance Prediction10 Feb 2021
- 2021MirrorAlign: A Super Lightweight Unsupervised Word Alignment Model via Cross-Lingual Contrastive Learning8 Feb 2021
- 2021Enhancing the Transformer Decoder with Transition-based Syntax29 Jan 2021