mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Testing Granger Non-Causality in Panels with Cross-Sectional Dependencies

arXiv 2202.11612 ↗First posted 23 Feb 2022stat.ME stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper proposes a new approach for testing Granger non-causality on panel data. Instead of aggregating panel member statistics, we aggregate their corresponding p-values and show that the resulting p-value approximately bounds the type I error by the chosen significance level even if the panel members are dependent. We compare our approach against the most widely used Granger causality algorithm on panel data and show that our approach yields lower FDR at the same power for large sample sizes and panels with cross-sectional dependencies. Finally, we examine COVID-19 data about confirmed cases and deaths measured in countries/regions worldwide and show that our approach is able to discover the true causal relation between confirmed cases and deaths while state-of-the-art approaches fail.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2022.

Builds on

8 of 56 references.

References · 8

  1. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  2. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  3. 2019Explainable Machine Learning for Scientific Insights and Discoveriescited by 165
  4. 2020Causal Interpretability for Machine Learning -- Problems, Methods and Evaluationcited by 82
  5. 2019Causal structure based root cause analysis of outlierscited by 65
  6. 2020Interpretability and Explainability: A Machine Learning Zoo Mini-tourcited by 55
  7. 2014High-Dimensional Inference: Confidence Intervals, p-Values and R-Software hdicited by 18
  8. 2015Telling cause from effect in deterministic linear dynamical systemscited by 12

Built on by

Not cited yet.