mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Enabling arbitrary translation objectives with Adaptive Tree Search

arXiv 2202.11444 ↗First posted 23 Feb 2022cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce an adaptive tree search algorithm, that can find high-scoring outputs under translation models that make no assumptions about the form or structure of the search objective. This algorithm -- a deterministic variant of Monte Carlo tree search -- enables the exploration of new kinds of models that are unencumbered by constraints imposed to make decoding tractable, such as autoregressivity or conditional independence assumptions. When applied to autoregressive models, our algorithm has different biases than beam search has, which enables a new analysis of the role of decoding bias in autoregressive models. Empirically, we show that our adaptive tree search algorithm finds outputs with substantially better model scores compared to beam search in autoregressive models, and compared to reranking techniques in models whose scores do not decompose additively with respect to the words in the output. We also characterise the correlation of several translation model objectives with respect to BLEU. We find that while some standard models are poorly calibrated and benefit from the beam search bias, other often more robust models (autoregressive models tuned to maximize expected automatic metric scores, the noisy channel model and a newly proposed objective) benefit from increasing amounts of search using our proposed decoder, whereas the beam search bias limits the improvements obtained from such objectives. Thus, we argue that as models improve, the improvements may be masked by over-reliance on beam search or reranking based methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2022.

Builds on

20 of 38 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
  3. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
  4. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  5. 2019Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Contextcited by 1,830
  6. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
  7. 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,471
  8. 2019Fast Transformer Decoding: One Write-Head is All You Needcited by 700
  9. 2017Six Challenges for Neural Machine Translationcited by 334
  10. 2013One Billion Word Benchmark for Measuring Progress in Statistical Language Modelingcited by 302
  11. 2017OpenNMT: Open-source Toolkit for Neural Machine Translationcited by 251
  12. 2018Deterministic Non-Autoregressive Neural Sequence Modeling by Iterative Refinementcited by 194
8 more
  1. 2019Facebook FAIR's WMT19 News Translation Task Submissioncited by 179
  2. 2015Minimum Risk Training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 114
  3. 2019On NMT Search Errors and Model Errors: Cat Got Your Tongue?cited by 114
  4. 2020If beam search is the answer, what was the question?cited by 114
  5. 2021Machine Translation Decoding beyond Beam Searchcited by 55
  6. 2019Simple and Effective Noisy Channel Modeling for Neural Machine Translationcited by 37
  7. 2021Pretraining the Noisy Channel Model for Task-Oriented Dialoguecited by 23
  8. 2016The Neural Noisy Channelcited by 19

Built on by

Not cited yet.