Study of Feature Importance for Quantum Machine Learning Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Predictor importance is a crucial part of data preprocessing pipelines in classical and quantum machine learning (QML). This work presents the first study of its kind in which feature importance for QML models has been explored and contrasted against their classical machine learning (CML) equivalents. We developed a hybrid quantum-classical architecture where QML models are trained and feature importance values are calculated from classical algorithms on a real-world dataset. This architecture has been implemented on ESPN Fantasy Football data using Qiskit statevector simulators and IBM quantum hardware such as the IBMQ Mumbai and IBMQ Montreal systems. Even though we are in the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era, the physical quantum computing results are promising. To facilitate current quantum scale, we created a data tiering, model aggregation, and novel validation methods. Notably, the feature importance magnitudes from the quantum models had a much higher variation when contrasted to classical models. We can show that equivalent QML and CML models are complementary through diversity measurements. The diversity between QML and CML demonstrates that both approaches can contribute to a solution in different ways. Within this paper we focus on Quantum Support Vector Classifiers (QSVC), Variational Quantum Circuit (VQC), and their classical counterparts. The ESPN and IBM fantasy football Trade Assistant combines advanced statistical analysis with the natural language processing of Watson Discovery to serve up personalized trade recommendations that are fair. Here, player valuation data of each player has been considered and this work can be extended to calculate the feature importance of other QML models such as Quantum Boltzmann machines.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2022.
Builds on
6 of 21 references.
References · 6
- 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 665
- 2018All Models are Wrong, but Many are Useful: Learning a Variable's Importance by Studying an Entire Class of Prediction Models Simultaneouslycited by 373
- 2016Visualizing the Effects of Predictor Variables in Black Box Supervised Learning Modelscited by 213
- 2018q-means: A quantum algorithm for unsupervised machine learningcited by 55
- 2018TED: Teaching AI to Explain its Decisionscited by 33
- 2021Large Scale Diverse Combinatorial Optimization: ESPN Fantasy Football Player Tradescited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
7 papers.
- 2022Quantum Neural Network Classifiers: A Tutorialcited by 13
- 2024Feature Importance and Explainability in Quantum Machine Learningcited by 4
- 2022Quantum Machine Learning Applied to the Classification of Diabetescited by 2
- 2023Several fitness functions and entanglement gates in quantum kernel generationcited by 2
- 2023A novel feature selection method based on quantum support vector machinecited by 1
- 2025Detecting underdetermination in parameterized quantum circuitscited by 0
- 2025Component Based Quantum Machine Learning Explainabilitycited by 0
- 2025Component Based Quantum Machine Learning Explainability14 Jun 2025
- 2025Detecting underdetermination in parameterized quantum circuits4 Apr 2025
- 2024Feature Importance and Explainability in Quantum Machine Learning14 May 2024
- 2023A novel feature selection method based on quantum support vector machine29 Nov 2023
- 2023Several fitness functions and entanglement gates in quantum kernel generation22 Aug 2023
- 2022Quantum Machine Learning Applied to the Classification of Diabetes31 Dec 2022
- 2022Quantum Neural Network Classifiers: A Tutorial6 Jun 2022