Parallel MCMC Without Embarrassing Failures
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Embarrassingly parallel Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) exploits parallel computing to scale Bayesian inference to large datasets by using a two-step approach. First, MCMC is run in parallel on (sub)posteriors defined on data partitions. Then, a server combines local results. While efficient, this framework is very sensitive to the quality of subposterior sampling. Common sampling problems such as missing modes or misrepresentation of low-density regions are amplified -- instead of being corrected -- in the combination phase, leading to catastrophic failures. In this work, we propose a novel combination strategy to mitigate this issue. Our strategy, Parallel Active Inference (PAI), leverages Gaussian Process (GP) surrogate modeling and active learning. After fitting GPs to subposteriors, PAI (i) shares information between GP surrogates to cover missing modes; and (ii) uses active sampling to individually refine subposterior approximations. We validate PAI in challenging benchmarks, including heavy-tailed and multi-modal posteriors and a real-world application to computational neuroscience. Empirical results show that PAI succeeds where previous methods catastrophically fail, with a small communication overhead.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2022.
Builds on
20 of 38 references.
References · 20
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2018GPyTorch: Blackbox Matrix-Matrix Gaussian Process Inference with GPU Accelerationcited by 603
- 2019A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 555
- 2015High Dimensional Bayesian Optimisation and Bandits via Additive Modelscited by 137
- 2013Gaussian Process Kernels for Pattern Discovery and Extrapolationcited by 131
- 2019Exact Gaussian Processes on a Million Data Pointscited by 118
- 2014Sampling for Inference in Probabilistic Models with Fast Bayesian Quadraturecited by 31
- 2013Asymptotically Exact, Embarrassingly Parallel MCMCcited by 30
- 2018Partitioned Variational Inference: A unified framework encompassing federated and continual learningcited by 29
- 2021QLSD: Quantised Langevin stochastic dynamics for Bayesian federated learningcited by 26
- 2016Patterns of Scalable Bayesian Inferencecited by 24
- 2020Variational Bayesian Monte Carlo with Noisy Likelihoodscited by 23
8 more
- 2018Variational Bayesian Monte Carlocited by 20
- 2019Parallel Gaussian process surrogate Bayesian inference with noisy likelihood evaluationscited by 18
- 2020Federated Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamicscited by 16
- 2016Merging MCMC Subposteriors through Gaussian-Process Approximationscited by 13
- 2021When are Iterative Gaussian Processes Reliably Accurate?cited by 12
- 2019Embarrassingly parallel MCMC using deep invertible transformationscited by 11
- 2015Parallelizing MCMC with Random Partition Treescited by 10
- 2017Adaptive Gaussian process approximation for Bayesian inference with expensive likelihood functionscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 5; 2025: 2.
11 papers.
- 2024Parallel Simulation for Log-concave Sampling and Score-based Diffusion Modelscited by 6
- 2024Enhancing Transfer Learning with Flexible Nonparametric Posterior Samplingcited by 5
- 2023Machine Learning and the Future of Bayesian Computationcited by 4
- 2023Fast post-process Bayesian inference with Variational Sparse Bayesian Quadraturecited by 3
- 2024Embarrassingly Parallel GFlowNetscited by 3
- 2022Federated Averaging Langevin Dynamics: Toward a unified theory and new algorithmscited by 2
- 2022Data Subsampling for Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 1
- 2024Comparison of parallel SMC and MCMC for Bayesian deep learningcited by 1
- 2024One-Shot Federated Learning with Bayesian Pseudocoresetscited by 1
- 2025Normalizing Flow Regression for Bayesian Inference with Offline Likelihood Evaluationscited by 1
- 2025Measuring the right thing: justifying metrics in AI impact assessmentscited by 0
- 2025Normalizing Flow Regression for Bayesian Inference with Offline Likelihood Evaluations15 Apr 2025
- 2025Measuring the right thing: justifying metrics in AI impact assessments7 Apr 2025
- 2024Parallel Simulation for Log-concave Sampling and Score-based Diffusion Models10 Dec 2024
- 2024Embarrassingly Parallel GFlowNets5 Jun 2024
- 2024One-Shot Federated Learning with Bayesian Pseudocoresets4 Jun 2024
- 2024Enhancing Transfer Learning with Flexible Nonparametric Posterior Sampling12 Mar 2024
- 2024Comparison of parallel SMC and MCMC for Bayesian deep learning9 Feb 2024
- 2023Machine Learning and the Future of Bayesian Computation21 Apr 2023
- 2023Fast post-process Bayesian inference with Variational Sparse Bayesian Quadrature9 Mar 2023
- 2022Federated Averaging Langevin Dynamics: Toward a unified theory and new algorithms31 Oct 2022
- 2022Data Subsampling for Bayesian Neural Networks17 Oct 2022