Embarrassingly parallel MCMC using deep invertible transformations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While MCMC methods have become a main work-horse for Bayesian inference, scaling them to large distributed datasets is still a challenge. Embarrassingly parallel MCMC strategies take a divide-and-conquer stance to achieve this by writing the target posterior as a product of subposteriors, running MCMC for each of them in parallel and subsequently combining the results. The challenge then lies in devising efficient aggregation strategies. Current strategies trade-off between approximation quality, and costs of communication and computation. In this work, we introduce a novel method that addresses these issues simultaneously. Our key insight is to introduce a deep invertible transformation to approximate each of the subposteriors. These approximations can be made accurate even for complex distributions and serve as intermediate representations, keeping the total communication cost limited. Moreover, they enable us to sample from the product of the subposteriors using an efficient and stable importance sampling scheme. We demonstrate the approach outperforms available state-of-the-art methods in a range of challenging scenarios, including high-dimensional and heterogeneous subposteriors.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.
11 papers.
- 2021DG-LMC: A Turn-key and Scalable Synchronous Distributed MCMC Algorithm via Langevin Monte Carlo within Gibbscited by 11
- 2022Parallel MCMC Without Embarrassing Failurescited by 11
- 2024On Divergence Measures for Training GFlowNetscited by 6
- 2021Decentralized Bayesian Learning with Metropolis-Adjusted Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 4
- 2022Client Selection for Federated Bayesian Learningcited by 4
- 2023Machine Learning and the Future of Bayesian Computationcited by 4
- 2023Simulation-based stackingcited by 3
- 2024Embarrassingly Parallel GFlowNetscited by 3
- 2022Federated Averaging Langevin Dynamics: Toward a unified theory and new algorithmscited by 2
- 2025Federated Generalised Variational Inference: A Robust Probabilistic Federated Learning Frameworkcited by 1
- 2024Diffusion Generative Modelling for Divide-and-Conquer MCMCcited by 0
- 2025Federated Generalised Variational Inference: A Robust Probabilistic Federated Learning Framework2 Feb 2025
- 2024On Divergence Measures for Training GFlowNets12 Oct 2024
- 2024Diffusion Generative Modelling for Divide-and-Conquer MCMC17 Jun 2024
- 2024Embarrassingly Parallel GFlowNets5 Jun 2024
- 2023Simulation-based stacking25 Oct 2023
- 2023Machine Learning and the Future of Bayesian Computation21 Apr 2023
- 2022Client Selection for Federated Bayesian Learning11 Dec 2022
- 2022Federated Averaging Langevin Dynamics: Toward a unified theory and new algorithms31 Oct 2022
- 2022Parallel MCMC Without Embarrassing Failures22 Feb 2022
- 2021Decentralized Bayesian Learning with Metropolis-Adjusted Hamiltonian Monte Carlo15 Jul 2021
- 2021DG-LMC: A Turn-key and Scalable Synchronous Distributed MCMC Algorithm via Langevin Monte Carlo within Gibbs11 Jun 2021