mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Individualized PATE: Differentially Private Machine Learning with Individual Privacy Guarantees

arXiv 2202.10517 ↗First posted 21 Feb 2022cs.LG cs.CRcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Applying machine learning (ML) to sensitive domains requires privacy protection of the underlying training data through formal privacy frameworks, such as differential privacy (DP). Yet, usually, the privacy of the training data comes at the cost of the resulting ML models' utility. One reason for this is that DP uses one uniform privacy budget epsilon for all training data points, which has to align with the strictest privacy requirement encountered among all data holders. In practice, different data holders have different privacy requirements and data points of data holders with lower requirements can contribute more information to the training process of the ML models. To account for this need, we propose two novel methods based on the Private Aggregation of Teacher Ensembles (PATE) framework to support the training of ML models with individualized privacy guarantees. We formally describe the methods, provide a theoretical analysis of their privacy bounds, and experimentally evaluate their effect on the final model's utility using the MNIST, SVHN, and Adult income datasets. Our empirical results show that the individualized privacy methods yield ML models of higher accuracy than the non-individualized baseline. Thereby, we improve the privacy-utility trade-off in scenarios in which different data holders consent to contribute their sensitive data at different individual privacy levels.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2022.

Builds on

15 of 48 references.

References · 15

  1. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  2. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
  3. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,391
  4. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
  5. 2017Virtual Adversarial Training: A Regularization Method for Supervised and Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 920
  6. 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 650
  7. 2016Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Datacited by 348
  8. 2018Scalable Private Learning with PATEcited by 269
  9. 2018Privacy Amplification by Subsampling: Tight Analyses via Couplings and Divergencescited by 242
  10. 2020Differentially Private Learning Needs Better Features (or Much More Data)cited by 235
  11. 2021Adversary Instantiation: Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Machine Learningcited by 199
  12. 2020Individual Privacy Accounting via a Renyi Filtercited by 59
3 more
  1. 2021CaPC Learning: Confidential and Private Collaborative Learningcited by 33
  2. 2015Heterogeneous Differential Privacycited by 30
  3. 2020Towards Effective Differential Privacy Communication for Users' Data Sharing Decision and Comprehensioncited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

10 papers.