Data-Driven Mitigation of Adversarial Text Perturbation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Social networks have become an indispensable part of our lives, with billions of people producing ever-increasing amounts of text. At such scales, content policies and their enforcement become paramount. To automate moderation, questionable content is detected by Natural Language Processing (NLP) classifiers. However, high-performance classifiers are hampered by misspellings and adversarial text perturbations. In this paper, we classify intentional and unintentional adversarial text perturbation into ten types and propose a deobfuscation pipeline to make NLP models robust to such perturbations. We propose Continuous Word2Vec (CW2V), our data-driven method to learn word embeddings that ensures that perturbations of words have embeddings similar to those of the original words. We show that CW2V embeddings are generally more robust to text perturbations than embeddings based on character ngrams. Our robust classification pipeline combines deobfuscation and classification, using proposed defense methods and word embeddings to classify whether Facebook posts are requesting engagement such as likes. Our pipeline results in engagement bait classification that goes from 0.70 to 0.67 AUC with adversarial text perturbation, while character ngram-based word embedding methods result in downstream classification that goes from 0.76 to 0.64.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2022.
Builds on
12 of 20 references.
References · 12
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
- 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,578
- 2018TextBugger: Generating Adversarial Text Against Real-world Applicationscited by 376
- 2018Black-box Generation of Adversarial Text Sequences to Evade Deep Learning Classifierscited by 341
- 2017Synthetic and Natural Noise Both Break Neural Machine Translationcited by 304
- 2019Text Processing Like Humans Do: Visually Attacking and Shielding NLP Systemscited by 99
- 2020Robust Encodings: A Framework for Combating Adversarial Typoscited by 58
- 2019Learning to Discriminate Perturbations for Blocking Adversarial Attacks in Text Classificationcited by 55
- 2019Misspelling Oblivious Word Embeddingscited by 19
- 2019Generating Black-Box Adversarial Examples for Text Classifiers Using a Deep Reinforced Modelcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2022A Survey of Adversarial Defences and Robustness in NLPcited by 22
- 2022Time-Aware Datasets are Adaptive Knowledgebases for the New Normalcited by 1
- 2022A Mutation-based Text Generation for Adversarial Machine Learning Applicationscited by 1
- 2023NoisyHate: Mining Online Human-Written Perturbations for Realistic Robustness Benchmarking of Content Moderation Modelscited by 1
- 2026Hijacking Text Heritage: Hiding the Human Signature through Homoglyphic Substitutioncited by 0
- 2026Hijacking Text Heritage: Hiding the Human Signature through Homoglyphic Substitution11 Apr 2026
- 2023NoisyHate: Mining Online Human-Written Perturbations for Realistic Robustness Benchmarking of Content Moderation Models18 Mar 2023
- 2022A Mutation-based Text Generation for Adversarial Machine Learning Applications21 Dec 2022
- 2022Time-Aware Datasets are Adaptive Knowledgebases for the New Normal22 Nov 2022
- 2022A Survey of Adversarial Defences and Robustness in NLP12 Mar 2022