mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Should I send this notification? Optimizing push notifications decision making by modeling the future

arXiv 2202.08812 ↗First posted 17 Feb 2022cs.IR cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most recommender systems are myopic, that is they optimize based on the immediate response of the user. This may be misaligned with the true objective, such as creating long term user satisfaction. In this work we focus on mobile push notifications, where the long term effects of recommender system decisions can be particularly strong. For example, sending too many or irrelevant notifications may annoy a user and cause them to disable notifications. However, a myopic system will always choose to send a notification since negative effects occur in the future. This is typically mitigated using heuristics. However, heuristics can be hard to reason about or improve, require retuning each time the system is changed, and may be suboptimal. To counter these drawbacks, there is significant interest in recommender systems that optimize directly for long-term value (LTV). Here, we describe a method for maximising LTV by using model-based reinforcement learning (RL) to make decisions about whether to send push notifications. We model the effects of sending a notification on the user's future behavior. Much of the prior work applying RL to maximise LTV in recommender systems has focused on session-based optimization, while the time horizon for notification decision making in this work extends over several days. We test this approach in an A/B test on a major social network. We show that by optimizing decisions about push notifications we are able to send less notifications and obtain a higher open rate than the baseline system, while generating the same level of user engagement on the platform as the existing, heuristic-based, system.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2022.

Builds on

13 of 31 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  3. 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problemscited by 1,873
  4. 2018Top-K Off-Policy Correction for a REINFORCE Recommender Systemcited by 181
  5. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning in Large Discrete Action Spacescited by 158
  6. 2019Reinforcement Learning to Optimize Long-term User Engagement in Recommender Systemscited by 90
  7. 2018RecoGym: A Reinforcement Learning Environment for the problem of Product Recommendation in Online Advertisingcited by 65
  8. 2021Causal Reinforcement Learning using Observational and Interventional Datacited by 38
  9. 2018Reinforcement Learning to Rank in E-Commerce Search Engine: Formalization, Analysis, and Applicationcited by 33
  10. 2019Reinforcement Learning for Slate-based Recommender Systems: A Tractable Decomposition and Practical Methodologycited by 27
  11. 2021RecSim NG: Toward Principled Uncertainty Modeling for Recommender Ecosystemscited by 21
  12. 2022Offline Reinforcement Learning for Mobile Notificationscited by 8
1 more
  1. 2022Learning to Rank For Push Notifications Using Pairwise Expected Regretcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

6 papers.