CLS: Cross Labeling Supervision for Semi-Supervised Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
It is well known that the success of deep neural networks is greatly attributed to large-scale labeled datasets. However, it can be extremely time-consuming and laborious to collect sufficient high-quality labeled data in most practical applications. Semi-supervised learning (SSL) provides an effective solution to reduce the cost of labeling by simultaneously leveraging both labeled and unlabeled data. In this work, we present Cross Labeling Supervision (CLS), a framework that generalizes the typical pseudo-labeling process. Based on FixMatch, where a pseudo label is generated from a weakly-augmented sample to teach the prediction on a strong augmentation of the same input sample, CLS allows the creation of both pseudo and complementary labels to support both positive and negative learning. To mitigate the confirmation bias of self-labeling and boost the tolerance to false labels, two different initialized networks with the same structure are trained simultaneously. Each network utilizes high-confidence labels from the other network as additional supervision signals. During the label generation phase, adaptive sample weights are assigned to artificial labels according to their prediction confidence. The sample weight plays two roles: quantify the generated labels' quality and reduce the disruption of inaccurate labels on network training. Experimental results on the semi-supervised classification task show that our framework outperforms existing approaches by large margins on the CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2022.
Builds on
22 of 37 references.
References · 22
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
- 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
- 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
- 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,391
- 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,311
- 2019Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Trainingcited by 1,060
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
- 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
- 2017Virtual Adversarial Training: A Regularization Method for Supervised and Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 920
- 2019Pseudo-Labeling and Confirmation Bias in Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 510
10 more
- 2021Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation with Cross Pseudo Supervisioncited by 463
- 2016Regularization With Stochastic Transformations and Perturbations for Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 441
- 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
- 2020Meta Pseudo Labelscited by 374
- 2021In Defense of Pseudo-Labeling: An Uncertainty-Aware Pseudo-label Selection Framework for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 301
- 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
- 2015Semi-Supervised Learning with Ladder Networkscited by 247
- 2014Learning with Pseudo-Ensemblescited by 241
- 2019NLNL: Negative Learning for Noisy Labelscited by 151
- 2019Dual Student: Breaking the Limits of the Teacher in Semi-supervised Learningcited by 104
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.