NEAT: A Label Noise-resistant Complementary Item Recommender System with Trustworthy Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The complementary item recommender system (CIRS) recommends the complementary items for a given query item. Existing CIRS models consider the item co-purchase signal as a proxy of the complementary relationship due to the lack of human-curated labels from the huge transaction records. These methods represent items in a complementary embedding space and model the complementary relationship as a point estimation of the similarity between items vectors. However, co-purchased items are not necessarily complementary to each other. For example, customers may frequently purchase bananas and bottled water within the same transaction, but these two items are not complementary. Hence, using co-purchase signals directly as labels will aggravate the model performance. On the other hand, the model evaluation will not be trustworthy if the labels for evaluation are not reflecting the true complementary relatedness. To address the above challenges from noisy labeling of the copurchase data, we model the co-purchases of two items as a Gaussian distribution, where the mean denotes the co-purchases from the complementary relatedness, and covariance denotes the co-purchases from the noise. To do so, we represent each item as a Gaussian embedding and parameterize the Gaussian distribution of co-purchases by the means and covariances from item Gaussian embedding. To reduce the impact of the noisy labels during evaluation, we propose an independence test-based method to generate a trustworthy label set with certain confidence. Our extensive experiments on both the publicly available dataset and the large-scale real-world dataset justify the effectiveness of our proposed model in complementary item recommendations compared with the state-of-the-art models.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Knowledge Graph Completion Models are Few-shot Learners: An Empirical Study of Relation Labeling in E-commerce with LLMscited by 24
- 2025No-Human in the Loop: Agentic Evaluation at Scale for Recommendationcited by 2
- 2022Fashion-Specific Attributes Interpretation via Dual Gaussian Visual-Semantic Embeddingcited by 1
- 2024Complementary Recommendation in E-commerce: Definition, Approaches, and Future Directionscited by 1
- 2025No-Human in the Loop: Agentic Evaluation at Scale for Recommendation4 Nov 2025
- 2024Complementary Recommendation in E-commerce: Definition, Approaches, and Future Directions24 Mar 2024
- 2023Knowledge Graph Completion Models are Few-shot Learners: An Empirical Study of Relation Labeling in E-commerce with LLMs17 May 2023
- 2022Fashion-Specific Attributes Interpretation via Dual Gaussian Visual-Semantic Embedding28 Oct 2022