mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Field of Experts Prior for Adapting Neural Networks at Test Time

arXiv 2202.05271 ↗First posted 10 Feb 2022cs.CV eess.IV stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Performance of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in image analysis tasks is often marred in the presence of acquisition-related distribution shifts between training and test images. Recently, it has been proposed to tackle this problem by fine-tuning trained CNNs for each test image. Such test-time-adaptation (TTA) is a promising and practical strategy for improving robustness to distribution shifts as it requires neither data sharing between institutions nor annotating additional data. Previous TTA methods use a helper model to increase similarity between outputs and/or features extracted from a test image with those of the training images. Such helpers, which are typically modeled using CNNs, can be task-specific and themselves vulnerable to distribution shifts in their inputs. To overcome these problems, we propose to carry out TTA by matching the feature distributions of test and training images, as modelled by a field-of-experts (FoE) prior. FoEs model complicated probability distributions as products of many simpler expert distributions. We use 1D marginal distributions of a trained task CNN's features as experts in the FoE model. Further, we compute principal components of patches of the task CNN's features, and consider the distributions of PCA loadings as additional experts. We validate the method on 5 MRI segmentation tasks (healthy tissues in 4 anatomical regions and lesions in 1 one anatomy), using data from 17 clinics, and on a MRI registration task, using data from 3 clinics. We find that the proposed FoE-based TTA is generically applicable in multiple tasks, and outperforms all previous TTA methods for lesion segmentation. For healthy tissue segmentation, the proposed method outperforms other task-agnostic methods, but a previous TTA method which is specifically designed for segmentation performs the best for most of the tested datasets. Our code is publicly available.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2022.

Builds on

30 of 65 references.

References · 30

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  3. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  4. 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,284
  5. 2017Deep Image Priorcited by 1,097
  6. 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 939
  7. 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 844
  8. 2018Do Deep Generative Models Know What They Don't Know?cited by 443
  9. 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 427
  10. 2019Domain Generalization via Model-Agnostic Learning of Semantic Featurescited by 405
  11. 2017Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: Full Training or Fine Tuning?cited by 220
  12. 2019Causality matters in medical imagingcited by 193
18 more
  1. 2016Unsupervised domain adaptation in brain lesion segmentation with adversarial networkscited by 125
  2. 2020Shape-aware Meta-learning for Generalizing Prostate MRI Segmentation to Unseen Domainscited by 124
  3. 2018Unsupervised Learning for Fast Probabilistic Diffeomorphic Registrationcited by 116
  4. 2019Standardized Assessment of Automatic Segmentation of White Matter Hyperintensities and Results of the WMH Segmentation Challengecited by 115
  5. 2020Test-Time Adaptable Neural Networks for Robust Medical Image Segmentationcited by 102
  6. 2020Density of States Estimation for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 74
  7. 2019Time-Dependent Deep Image Prior for Dynamic MRIcited by 70
  8. 2018SynSeg-Net: Synthetic Segmentation Without Target Modality Ground Truthcited by 68
  9. 2020Source-Relaxed Domain Adaptation for Image Segmentationcited by 52
  10. 2021Source-Free Adaptation to Measurement Shift via Bottom-Up Feature Restorationcited by 50
  11. 2018A Lifelong Learning Approach to Brain MR Segmentation Across Scanners and Protocolscited by 49
  12. 2018Training Deep Learning Based Denoisers without Ground Truth Datacited by 43
  13. 2019Image-Adaptive GAN based Reconstructioncited by 36
  14. 2021Semi-supervised Meta-learning with Disentanglement for Domain-generalised Medical Image Segmentationcited by 36
  15. 2019Correction Filter for Single Image Super-Resolution: Robustifying Off-the-Shelf Deep Super-Resolverscited by 35
  16. 2021Source-free Domain Adaptation via Distributional Alignment by Matching Batch Normalization Statisticscited by 24
  17. 2020Model Adaptation for Inverse Problems in Imagingcited by 20
  18. 2021Limitations of Post-Hoc Feature Alignment for Robustnesscited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.