Interpretable pipelines with evolutionarily optimized modules for RL tasks with visual inputs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The importance of explainability in AI has become a pressing concern, for which several explainable AI (XAI) approaches have been recently proposed. However, most of the available XAI techniques are post-hoc methods, which however may be only partially reliable, as they do not reflect exactly the state of the original models. Thus, a more direct way for achieving XAI is through interpretable (also called glass-box) models. These models have been shown to obtain comparable (and, in some cases, better) performance with respect to black-boxes models in various tasks such as classification and reinforcement learning. However, they struggle when working with raw data, especially when the input dimensionality increases and the raw inputs alone do not give valuable insights on the decision-making process. Here, we propose to use end-to-end pipelines composed of multiple interpretable models co-optimized by means of evolutionary algorithms, that allows us to decompose the decision-making process into two parts: computing high-level features from raw data, and reasoning on the extracted high-level features. We test our approach in reinforcement learning environments from the Atari benchmark, where we obtain comparable results (with respect to black-box approaches) in settings without stochastic frame-skipping, while performance degrades in frame-skipping settings.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2022.
Builds on
20 of 43 references.
References · 20
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
- 2019Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 1,353
- 2015Dueling Network Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 785
- 2017Evolution Strategies as a Scalable Alternative to Reinforcement Learningcited by 574
- 2019Reinforcement Learning in Healthcare: A Surveycited by 310
- 2020Agent57: Outperforming the Atari Human Benchmarkcited by 303
- 2019Challenges of Real-World Reinforcement Learningcited by 291
- 2017Revisiting the Arcade Learning Environment: Evaluation Protocols and Open Problems for General Agentscited by 269
- 2018Distributed Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 269
- 2017Noisy Networks for Explorationcited by 266
- 2020First return, then explorecited by 266
8 more
- 2021Do Feature Attribution Methods Correctly Attribute Features?cited by 98
- 2021Online and Offline Reinforcement Learning by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 90
- 2020Model Interpretability through the Lens of Computational Complexitycited by 75
- 2020Neuroevolution of Self-Interpretable Agentscited by 49
- 2020Evolutionary learning of interpretable decision treescited by 15
- 2020Learning a Formula of Interpretability to Learn Interpretable Formulascited by 14
- 2020Towards Interpretable-AI Policies Induction using Evolutionary Nonlinear Decision Trees for Discrete Action Systemscited by 12
- 2021GDI: Rethinking What Makes Reinforcement Learning Different From Supervised Learningcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2.
2 papers.
- 2022Quality Diversity Evolutionary Learning of Decision Treescited by 7
- 2022Interpretable AI for policy-making in pandemicscited by 5
- 2022Quality Diversity Evolutionary Learning of Decision Trees17 Aug 2022
- 2022Interpretable AI for policy-making in pandemics8 Apr 2022