mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding Value Decomposition Algorithms in Deep Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2202.04868 ↗First posted 10 Feb 2022cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Value function decomposition is becoming a popular rule of thumb for scaling up multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) in cooperative games. For such a decomposition rule to hold, the assumption of the individual-global max (IGM) principle must be made; that is, the local maxima on the decomposed value function per every agent must amount to the global maximum on the joint value function. This principle, however, does not have to hold in general. As a result, the applicability of value decomposition algorithms is concealed and their corresponding convergence properties remain unknown. In this paper, we make the first effort to answer these questions. Specifically, we introduce the set of cooperative games in which the value decomposition methods find their validity, which is referred as decomposable games. In decomposable games, we theoretically prove that applying the multi-agent fitted Q-Iteration algorithm (MA-FQI) will lead to an optimal Q-function. In non-decomposable games, the estimated Q-function by MA-FQI can still converge to the optimum under the circumstance that the Q-function needs projecting into the decomposable function space at each iteration. In both settings, we consider value function representations by practical deep neural networks and derive their corresponding convergence rates. To summarize, our results, for the first time, offer theoretical insights for MARL practitioners in terms of when value decomposition algorithms converge and why they perform well.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2022.

Builds on

18 of 30 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 733
  2. 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 697
  3. 2017Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent Learningcited by 490
  4. 2019QTRAN: Learning to Factorize with Transformation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 372
  5. 2015Norm-Based Capacity Control in Neural Networkscited by 299
  6. 2019Information-Theoretic Considerations in Batch Reinforcement Learningcited by 285
  7. 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Deep Q-Learningcited by 212
  8. 2019MAVEN: Multi-Agent Variational Explorationcited by 181
  9. 2021Trust Region Policy Optimisation in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 180
  10. 2020SMARTS: Scalable Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Training School for Autonomous Drivingcited by 121
  11. 2020Game-Theoretic Multiagent Reinforcement Learningcited by 92
  12. 2019Probabilistic Recursive Reasoning for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 68
6 more
  1. 2021Settling the Variance of Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 45
  2. 2020Multi-Agent Determinantal Q-Learningcited by 36
  3. 2016Risk Bounds for High-dimensional Ridge Function Combinations Including Neural Networkscited by 26
  4. 2020Towards Understanding Cooperative Multi-Agent Q-Learning with Value Factorizationcited by 26
  5. 2019Modelling Bounded Rationality in Multi-Agent Interactions by Generalized Recursive Reasoningcited by 24
  6. 2021MALib: A Parallel Framework for Population-based Multi-agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 23

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

6 papers.