Optimal learning rate schedules in high-dimensional non-convex optimization problems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning rate schedules are ubiquitously used to speed up and improve optimisation. Many different policies have been introduced on an empirical basis, and theoretical analyses have been developed for convex settings. However, in many realistic problems the loss-landscape is high-dimensional and non convex -- a case for which results are scarce. In this paper we present a first analytical study of the role of learning rate scheduling in this setting, focusing on Langevin optimization with a learning rate decaying as η(t)=t-β. We begin by considering models where the loss is a Gaussian random function on the N-dimensional sphere (Nrightarrow ∞), featuring an extensive number of critical points. We find that to speed up optimization without getting stuck in saddles, one must choose a decay rate β<1, contrary to convex setups where β=1 is generally optimal. We then add to the problem a signal to be recovered. In this setting, the dynamics decompose into two phases: an exploration phase where the dynamics navigates through rough parts of the landscape, followed by a convergence phase where the signal is detected and the dynamics enter a convex basin. In this case, it is optimal to keep a large learning rate during the exploration phase to escape the non-convex region as quickly as possible, then use the convex criterion β=1 to converge rapidly to the solution. Finally, we demonstrate that our conclusions hold in a common regression task involving neural networks.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2022.
Builds on
32 of 63 references.
References · 32
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
- 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,479
- 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 627
- 2022Grokking: Generalization Beyond Overfitting on Small Algorithmic Datasetscited by 599
- 2017Don't Decay the Learning Rate, Increase the Batch Sizecited by 313
- 2014The Loss Surfaces of Multilayer Networkscited by 278
- 2017Three Factors Influencing Minima in SGDcited by 270
- 2017The Marginal Value of Adaptive Gradient Methods in Machine Learningcited by 248
- 2019Towards Explaining the Regularization Effect of Initial Large Learning Rate in Training Neural Networkscited by 162
20 more
- 2015Stochastic modified equations and adaptive stochastic gradient algorithmscited by 141
- 2015Statistical physics of inference: Thresholds and algorithmscited by 128
- 2017Improving Generalization Performance by Switching from Adam to SGDcited by 121
- 2019Dynamics of stochastic gradient descent for two-layer neural networks in the teacher-student setupcited by 112
- 2018A Closer Look at Deep Learning Heuristics: Learning rate restarts, Warmup and Distillationcited by 110
- 2018Closing the Generalization Gap of Adaptive Gradient Methods in Training Deep Neural Networkscited by 89
- 2019The Step Decay Schedule: A Near Optimal, Geometrically Decaying Learning Rate Procedure For Least Squarescited by 67
- 2019Weight-space symmetry in deep networks gives rise to permutation saddles, connected by equal-loss valleys across the loss landscapecited by 61
- 2020Dynamical mean-field theory for stochastic gradient descent in Gaussian mixture classificationcited by 60
- 2020Is SGD a Bayesian sampler? Well, almostcited by 50
- 2021A Loss Curvature Perspective on Training Instability in Deep Learningcited by 39
- 2017The landscape of the spiked tensor modelcited by 34
- 2019Deep Learning Theory Review: An Optimal Control and Dynamical Systems Perspectivecited by 26
- 2019Who is Afraid of Big Bad Minima? Analysis of Gradient-Flow in a Spiked Matrix-Tensor Modelcited by 25
- 2021The effective noise of Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 25
- 2018Marvels and Pitfalls of the Langevin Algorithm in Noisy High-dimensional Inferencecited by 24
- 2018Complex energy landscapes in spiked-tensor and simple glassy models: ruggedness, arrangements of local minima and phase transitionscited by 23
- 2019The Effect of Network Width on Stochastic Gradient Descent and Generalization: an Empirical Studycited by 16
- 2021How to decay your learning ratecited by 11
- 2020Thresholds of descending algorithms in inference problemscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.
4 papers.
- 2022Self-Consistent Dynamical Field Theory of Kernel Evolution in Wide Neural Networkscited by 104
- 2025Scaling Collapse Reveals Universal Dynamics in Compute-Optimally Trained Neural Networkscited by 21
- 2023The RL Perceptron: Generalisation Dynamics of Policy Learning in High Dimensionscited by 5
- 2025A statistical physics framework for optimal learningcited by 3
- 2025A statistical physics framework for optimal learning10 Jul 2025
- 2025Scaling Collapse Reveals Universal Dynamics in Compute-Optimally Trained Neural Networks2 Jul 2025
- 2023The RL Perceptron: Generalisation Dynamics of Policy Learning in High Dimensions17 Jun 2023
- 2022Self-Consistent Dynamical Field Theory of Kernel Evolution in Wide Neural Networks19 May 2022