mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Prediction Sensitivity: Continual Audit of Counterfactual Fairness in Deployed Classifiers

arXiv 2202.04504 ↗First posted 9 Feb 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As AI-based systems increasingly impact many areas of our lives, auditing these systems for fairness is an increasingly high-stakes problem. Traditional group fairness metrics can miss discrimination against individuals and are difficult to apply after deployment. Counterfactual fairness describes an individualized notion of fairness but is even more challenging to evaluate after deployment. We present prediction sensitivity, an approach for continual audit of counterfactual fairness in deployed classifiers. Prediction sensitivity helps answer the question: would this prediction have been different, if this individual had belonged to a different demographic group -- for every prediction made by the deployed model. Prediction sensitivity can leverage correlations between protected status and other features and does not require protected status information at prediction time. Our empirical results demonstrate that prediction sensitivity is effective for detecting violations of counterfactual fairness.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2022.

Builds on

29 of 48 references.

References · 29

  1. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  2. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  3. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  4. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  5. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  6. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
  7. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
  8. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  9. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  10. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
  11. 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 467
  12. 2019Learning the Difference that Makes a Difference with Counterfactually-Augmented Datacited by 428
17 more
  1. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 368
  2. 2015The Variational Fair Autoencodercited by 223
  3. 2021Polyjuice: Generating Counterfactuals for Explaining, Evaluating, and Improving Modelscited by 219
  4. 2019Counterfactual Data Augmentation for Mitigating Gender Stereotypes in Languages with Rich Morphologycited by 200
  5. 2017Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning Fair Representationscited by 165
  6. 2017No Classification without Representation: Assessing Geodiversity Issues in Open Data Sets for the Developing Worldcited by 152
  7. 2018Counterfactual Fairness in Text Classification through Robustnesscited by 150
  8. 2019Reducing Sentiment Bias in Language Models via Counterfactual Evaluationcited by 148
  9. 2018Classification with Fairness Constraints: A Meta-Algorithm with Provable Guaranteescited by 146
  10. 2018Achieving Fairness through Adversarial Learning: an Application to Recidivism Predictioncited by 77
  11. 2020Generate Your Counterfactuals: Towards Controlled Counterfactual Generation for Textcited by 75
  12. 2019Image Counterfactual Sensitivity Analysis for Detecting Unintended Biascited by 74
  13. 2020Explaining The Efficacy of Counterfactually Augmented Datacited by 64
  14. 2019FlipTest: Fairness Testing via Optimal Transportcited by 51
  15. 2016Auditing Black-box Models for Indirect Influencecited by 41
  16. 2016A statistical framework for fair predictive algorithmscited by 37
  17. 2019Improved Adversarial Learning for Fair Classificationcited by 25

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

2 papers.