mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MBCT: Tree-Based Feature-Aware Binning for Individual Uncertainty Calibration

arXiv 2202.04348 ↗First posted 9 Feb 2022cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most machine learning classifiers only concern classification accuracy, while certain applications (such as medical diagnosis, meteorological forecasting, and computation advertising) require the model to predict the true probability, known as a calibrated estimate. In previous work, researchers have developed several calibration methods to post-process the outputs of a predictor to obtain calibrated values, such as binning and scaling methods. Compared with scaling, binning methods are shown to have distribution-free theoretical guarantees, which motivates us to prefer binning methods for calibration. However, we notice that existing binning methods have several drawbacks: (a) the binning scheme only considers the original prediction values, thus limiting the calibration performance; and (b) the binning approach is non-individual, mapping multiple samples in a bin to the same value, and thus is not suitable for order-sensitive applications. In this paper, we propose a feature-aware binning framework, called Multiple Boosting Calibration Trees (MBCT), along with a multi-view calibration loss to tackle the above issues. Our MBCT optimizes the binning scheme by the tree structures of features, and adopts a linear function in a tree node to achieve individual calibration. Our MBCT is non-monotonic, and has the potential to improve order accuracy, due to its learnable binning scheme and the individual calibration. We conduct comprehensive experiments on three datasets in different fields. Results show that our method outperforms all competing models in terms of both calibration error and order accuracy. We also conduct simulation experiments, justifying that the proposed multi-view calibration loss is a better metric in modeling calibration error.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2022.

Builds on

16 of 26 references.

References · 16

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  2. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  3. 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 813
  4. 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 359
  5. 2018Deep Interest Evolution Network for Click-Through Rate Predictioncited by 336
  6. 2019Verified Uncertainty Calibrationcited by 307
  7. 2020Mix-n-Match: Ensemble and Compositional Methods for Uncertainty Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 190
  8. 2020Mitigating Bias in Calibration Error Estimationcited by 100
  9. 2020Distribution-free binary classification: prediction sets, confidence intervals and calibrationcited by 79
  10. 2018Budget Constrained Bidding by Model-free Reinforcement Learning in Display Advertisingcited by 60
  11. 2020Individual Calibration with Randomized Forecastingcited by 50
  12. 2019Joint Optimization of Tree-based Index and Deep Model for Recommender Systemscited by 37
4 more
  1. 2019Bid Optimization by Multivariable Control in Display Advertisingcited by 37
  2. 2018Learning for Single-Shot Confidence Calibration in Deep Neural Networks through Stochastic Inferencescited by 25
  3. 2018Attended Temperature Scaling: A Practical Approach for Calibrating Deep Neural Networkscited by 21
  4. 2014Binary Classifier Calibration: Non-parametric approachcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 6; 2025: 2.

11 papers.