mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Generative multitask learning mitigates target-causing confounding

arXiv 2202.04136 ↗First posted 8 Feb 2022cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose generative multitask learning (GMTL), a simple and scalable approach to causal representation learning for multitask learning. Our approach makes a minor change to the conventional multitask inference objective, and improves robustness to target shift. Since GMTL only modifies the inference objective, it can be used with existing multitask learning methods without requiring additional training. The improvement in robustness comes from mitigating unobserved confounders that cause the targets, but not the input. We refer to them as target-causing confounders. These confounders induce spurious dependencies between the input and targets. This poses a problem for conventional multitask learning, due to its assumption that the targets are conditionally independent given the input. GMTL mitigates target-causing confounding at inference time, by removing the influence of the joint target distribution, and predicting all targets jointly. This removes the spurious dependencies between the input and targets, where the degree of removal is adjustable via a single hyperparameter. This flexibility is useful for managing the trade-off between in- and out-of-distribution generalization. Our results on the Attributes of People and Taskonomy datasets reflect an improved robustness to target shift across four multitask learning methods.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2022.

Builds on

35 of 76 references.

References · 35

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  4. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  5. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
  6. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  7. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
  8. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  9. 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,042
  10. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
  11. 2017A Survey on Multi-Task Learningcited by 838
  12. 2017An Overview of Multi-Task Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 791
23 more
  1. 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 785
  2. 2018Taskonomy: Disentangling Task Transfer Learningcited by 631
  3. 2020Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learningcited by 488
  4. 2016Cross-stitch Networks for Multi-task Learningcited by 466
  5. 2019Which Tasks Should Be Learned Together in Multi-task Learning?cited by 367
  6. 2019Multi-Task Deep Neural Networks for Natural Language Understandingcited by 349
  7. 2019Causality for Machine Learningcited by 242
  8. 2018The Natural Language Decathlon: Multitask Learning as Question Answeringcited by 235
  9. 2021MT-Opt: Continuous Multi-Task Robotic Reinforcement Learning at Scalecited by 226
  10. 2021Towards Causal Representation Learningcited by 207
  11. 2021Muppet: Massive Multi-task Representations with Pre-Finetuningcited by 192
  12. 2018Auxiliary Tasks in Multi-task Learningcited by 106
  13. 2020Robust Learning Through Cross-Task Consistencycited by 105
  14. 2018The Blessings of Multiple Causescited by 103
  15. 2017Measuring the tendency of CNNs to Learn Surface Statistical Regularitiescited by 87
  16. 2021Desiderata for Representation Learning: A Causal Perspectivecited by 76
  17. 2021Causally motivated Shortcut Removal Using Auxiliary Labelscited by 55
  18. 2021Nonlinear Invariant Risk Minimization: A Causal Approachcited by 42
  19. 2018Are Generative Classifiers More Robust to Adversarial Attacks?cited by 36
  20. 2020Multi-task learning for natural language processing in the 2020s: where are we going?cited by 27
  21. 2020Identifying Statistical Bias in Dataset Replicationcited by 24
  22. 2016When is multitask learning effective? Semantic sequence prediction under varying data conditionscited by 21
  23. 2020A Brief Review of Deep Multi-task Learning and Auxiliary Task Learningcited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

4 papers.