Generative multitask learning mitigates target-causing confounding
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose generative multitask learning (GMTL), a simple and scalable approach to causal representation learning for multitask learning. Our approach makes a minor change to the conventional multitask inference objective, and improves robustness to target shift. Since GMTL only modifies the inference objective, it can be used with existing multitask learning methods without requiring additional training. The improvement in robustness comes from mitigating unobserved confounders that cause the targets, but not the input. We refer to them as target-causing confounders. These confounders induce spurious dependencies between the input and targets. This poses a problem for conventional multitask learning, due to its assumption that the targets are conditionally independent given the input. GMTL mitigates target-causing confounding at inference time, by removing the influence of the joint target distribution, and predicting all targets jointly. This removes the spurious dependencies between the input and targets, where the degree of removal is adjustable via a single hyperparameter. This flexibility is useful for managing the trade-off between in- and out-of-distribution generalization. Our results on the Attributes of People and Taskonomy datasets reflect an improved robustness to target shift across four multitask learning methods.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2022.
Builds on
35 of 76 references.
References · 35
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
- 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
- 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,042
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
- 2017A Survey on Multi-Task Learningcited by 838
- 2017An Overview of Multi-Task Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 791
23 more
- 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 785
- 2018Taskonomy: Disentangling Task Transfer Learningcited by 631
- 2020Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learningcited by 488
- 2016Cross-stitch Networks for Multi-task Learningcited by 466
- 2019Which Tasks Should Be Learned Together in Multi-task Learning?cited by 367
- 2019Multi-Task Deep Neural Networks for Natural Language Understandingcited by 349
- 2019Causality for Machine Learningcited by 242
- 2018The Natural Language Decathlon: Multitask Learning as Question Answeringcited by 235
- 2021MT-Opt: Continuous Multi-Task Robotic Reinforcement Learning at Scalecited by 226
- 2021Towards Causal Representation Learningcited by 207
- 2021Muppet: Massive Multi-task Representations with Pre-Finetuningcited by 192
- 2018Auxiliary Tasks in Multi-task Learningcited by 106
- 2020Robust Learning Through Cross-Task Consistencycited by 105
- 2018The Blessings of Multiple Causescited by 103
- 2017Measuring the tendency of CNNs to Learn Surface Statistical Regularitiescited by 87
- 2021Desiderata for Representation Learning: A Causal Perspectivecited by 76
- 2021Causally motivated Shortcut Removal Using Auxiliary Labelscited by 55
- 2021Nonlinear Invariant Risk Minimization: A Causal Approachcited by 42
- 2018Are Generative Classifiers More Robust to Adversarial Attacks?cited by 36
- 2020Multi-task learning for natural language processing in the 2020s: where are we going?cited by 27
- 2020Identifying Statistical Bias in Dataset Replicationcited by 24
- 2016When is multitask learning effective? Semantic sequence prediction under varying data conditionscited by 21
- 2020A Brief Review of Deep Multi-task Learning and Auxiliary Task Learningcited by 18
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022Beyond Invariance: Test-Time Label-Shift Adaptation for Distributions with "Spurious" Correlationscited by 7
- 2025Supervised Contrastive Block Disentanglementcited by 2
- 2023Estimating treatment effects from single-arm trials via latent-variable modelingcited by 1
- 2023Multitask Learning Can Improve Worst-Group Outcomescited by 1
- 2025Supervised Contrastive Block Disentanglement11 Feb 2025
- 2023Multitask Learning Can Improve Worst-Group Outcomes5 Dec 2023
- 2023Estimating treatment effects from single-arm trials via latent-variable modeling6 Nov 2023
- 2022Beyond Invariance: Test-Time Label-Shift Adaptation for Distributions with "Spurious" Correlations28 Nov 2022