mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Context-Aware Discrimination Detection in Job Vacancies using Computational Language Models

arXiv 2202.03907 ↗First posted 2 Feb 2022cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Discriminatory job vacancies are disapproved worldwide, but remain persistent. Discrimination in job vacancies can be explicit by directly referring to demographic memberships of candidates. More implicit forms of discrimination are also present that may not always be illegal but still influence the diversity of applicants. Explicit written discrimination is still present in numerous job vacancies, as was recently observed in the Netherlands. Current efforts for the detection of explicit discrimination concern the identification of job vacancies containing potentially discriminating terms such as "young" or "male". However, automatic detection is inefficient due to low precision: e.g. "we are a young company" or "working with mostly male patients" are phrases that contain explicit terms, while the context shows that these do not reflect discriminatory content. In this paper, we show how machine learning based computational language models can raise precision in the detection of explicit discrimination by identifying when the potentially discriminating terms are used in a discriminatory context. We focus on gender discrimination, which indeed suffers from low precision when filtering explicit terms. First, we created a data set for gender discrimination in job vacancies. Second, we investigated a variety of computational language models for discriminatory context detection. Third, we evaluated the capability of these models to detect unforeseen discriminating terms in context. The results show that machine learning based methods can detect explicit gender discrimination with high precision and help in finding new forms of discrimination. Accordingly, the proposed methods can substantially increase the effectiveness of detecting job vacancies which are highly suspected to be discriminatory. In turn, this may lower the discrimination experienced at the start of the recruitment process.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2022.

Builds on

18 of 52 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  5. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  6. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  7. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  8. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
  9. 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
  10. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  11. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
  12. 2014Distributed Representations of Sentences and Documentscited by 677
6 more
  1. 2019Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Settingcited by 346
  2. 2019Text Classification Algorithms: A Surveycited by 163
  3. 2019BERTje: A Dutch BERT Modelcited by 109
  4. 2020Hurtful Words: Quantifying Biases in Clinical Contextual Word Embeddingscited by 79
  5. 2019Does BERT Make Any Sense? Interpretable Word Sense Disambiguation with Contextualized Embeddingscited by 55
  6. 2020Demographics Should Not Be the Reason of Toxicity: Mitigating Discrimination in Text Classifications with Instance Weightingcited by 41

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.