Boolean Observation Games
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce Boolean Observation Games, a subclass of multi-player finite strategic games with incomplete information and qualitative objectives. In Boolean observation games, each player is associated with a finite set of propositional variables of which only it can observe the value, and it controls whether and to whom it can reveal that value. It does not control the given, fixed, value of variables. Boolean observation games are a generalization of Boolean games, a well-studied subclass of strategic games but with complete information, and wherein each player controls the value of its variables. In Boolean observation games, player goals describe multi-agent knowledge of variables. As in classical strategic games, players choose their strategies simultaneously and therefore observation games capture aspects of both imperfect and incomplete information. They require reasoning about sets of outcomes given sets of indistinguishable valuations of variables. An outcome relation between such sets determines what the Nash equilibria are. We present various outcome relations, including a qualitative variant of ex-post equilibrium. We identify conditions under which, given an outcome relation, Nash equilibria are guaranteed to exist. We also study the complexity of checking for the existence of Nash equilibria and of verifying if a strategy profile is a Nash equilibrium. We further study the subclass of Boolean observation games with `knowing whether' goal formulas, for which the satisfaction does not depend on the value of variables. We show that each such Boolean observation game corresponds to a Boolean game and vice versa, by a different correspondence, and that both correspondences are precise in terms of existence of Nash equilibria.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2022.
Builds on
4 of 44 references.
References · 4
- 2013Graphical Models for Game Theorycited by 21
- 2013Strategic Voting and the Logic of Knowledgecited by 1
- 2013EGuaranteeNash for Boolean Games is NEXP-Hardcited by 1
- 2018How does uncertainty about other voters determine a strategic vote?cited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.