mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

EGuaranteeNash for Boolean Games is NEXP-Hard

arXiv 1312.4114 ↗First posted 15 Dec 2013cs.GTcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Boolean games are an expressive and natural formalism through which to investigate problems of strategic interaction in multiagent systems. Although they have been widely studied, almost all previous work on Nash equilibria in Boolean games has focused on the restricted setting of pure strategies. This is a shortcoming as finite games are guaranteed to have at least one equilibrium in mixed strategies, but many simple games fail to have pure strategy equilibria at all. We address this by showing that a natural decision problem about mixed equilibria: determining whether a Boolean game has a mixed strategy equilibrium that guarantees every player a given payoff, is NEXP-hard. Accordingly, the ε variety of the problem is NEXP-complete. The proof can be adapted to show coNEXP-hardness of a similar question: whether all Nash equilibria of a Boolean game guarantee every player at least the given payoff.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Dec 2013.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.