mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Causal effect of racial bias in data and machine learning algorithms on user persuasiveness & discriminatory decision making: An Empirical Study

arXiv 2202.00471 ↗First posted 22 Jan 2022cs.CL cs.CYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Language data and models demonstrate various types of bias, be it ethnic, religious, gender, or socioeconomic. AI/NLP models, when trained on the racially biased dataset, AI/NLP models instigate poor model explainability, influence user experience during decision making and thus further magnifies societal biases, raising profound ethical implications for society. The motivation of the study is to investigate how AI systems imbibe bias from data and produce unexplainable discriminatory outcomes and influence an individual's articulateness of system outcome due to the presence of racial bias features in datasets. The design of the experiment involves studying the counterfactual impact of racial bias features present in language datasets and its associated effect on the model outcome. A mixed research methodology is adopted to investigate the cross implication of biased model outcome on user experience, effect on decision-making through controlled lab experimentation. The findings provide foundation support for correlating the implication of carry-over an artificial intelligence model solving NLP task due to biased concept presented in the dataset. Further, the research outcomes justify the negative influence on users' persuasiveness that leads to alter the decision-making quotient of an individual when trying to rely on the model outcome to act. The paper bridges the gap across the harm caused in establishing poor customer trustworthiness due to an inequitable system design and provides strong support for researchers, policymakers, and data scientists to build responsible AI frameworks within organizations.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jan 2022.

Builds on

19 of 84 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  3. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
  4. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 956
  5. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 901
  6. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
  7. 2020Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiencescited by 253
  8. 2019Racial Bias in Hate Speech and Abusive Language Detection Datasetscited by 209
  9. 2018On Human Predictions with Explanations and Predictions of Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Deception Detectioncited by 159
  10. 2018Reducing Gender Bias in Abusive Language Detectioncited by 152
  11. 2019Black is to Criminal as Caucasian is to Police: Detecting and Removing Multiclass Bias in Word Embeddingscited by 147
  12. 2019Identifying and Correcting Label Bias in Machine Learningcited by 146
7 more
  1. 2016Mixing Dirichlet Topic Models and Word Embeddings to Make lda2veccited by 19
  2. 2021Combat COVID-19 Infodemic Using Explainable Natural Language Processing Modelscited by 17
  3. 2018Identifying Bias in AI using Simulationcited by 6
  4. 2019Using Data Science to Understand the Film Industry's Gender Gapcited by 6
  5. 2019Interpretable neural networks based on continuous-valued logic and multicriteria decision operatorscited by 4
  6. 2021Understanding Mental Models of AI through Player-AI Interactioncited by 4
  7. 2019Fairness in Machine Learning with Tractable Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

2 papers.