mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Language Dependencies in Adversarial Attacks on Speech Recognition Systems

arXiv 2202.00399 ↗First posted 1 Feb 2022cs.CL cs.CR cs.SDcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems are ubiquitously present in our daily devices. They are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where manipulated input samples fool the ASR system's recognition. While adversarial examples for various English ASR systems have already been analyzed, there exists no inter-language comparative vulnerability analysis. We compare the attackability of a German and an English ASR system, taking Deepspeech as an example. We investigate if one of the language models is more susceptible to manipulations than the other. The results of our experiments suggest statistically significant differences between English and German in terms of computational effort necessary for the successful generation of adversarial examples. This result encourages further research in language-dependent characteristics in the robustness analysis of ASR.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2022.

Builds on

7 of 17 references.

References · 7

  1. 2014Deep Speech: Scaling up end-to-end speech recognitioncited by 354
  2. 2018Audio Adversarial Examples: Targeted Attacks on Speech-to-Textcited by 268
  3. 2019Imperceptible, Robust, and Targeted Adversarial Examples for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 123
  4. 2019Lingvo: a Modular and Scalable Framework for Sequence-to-Sequence Modelingcited by 86
  5. 2020SoK: The Faults in our ASRs: An Overview of Attacks against Automatic Speech Recognition and Speaker Identification Systemscited by 46
  6. 2019Imperio: Robust Over-the-Air Adversarial Examples for Automatic Speech Recognition Systemscited by 16
  7. 2020LeakyPick: IoT Audio Spy Detectorcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.