POTATO: exPlainable infOrmation exTrAcTion framewOrk
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present POTATO, a task- and languageindependent framework for human-in-the-loop (HITL) learning of rule-based text classifiers using graph-based features. POTATO handles any type of directed graph and supports parsing text into Abstract Meaning Representations (AMR), Universal Dependencies (UD), and 4lang semantic graphs. A streamlit-based user interface allows users to build rule systems from graph patterns, provides real-time evaluation based on ground truth data, and suggests rules by ranking graph features using interpretable machine learning models. Users can also provide patterns over graphs using regular expressions, and POTATO can recommend refinements of such rules. POTATO is applied in projects across domains and languages, including classification tasks on German legal text and English social media data. All components of our system are written in Python, can be installed via pip, and are released under an MIT License on GitHub.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2022.
Builds on
31 of 57 references.
References · 31
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
- 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 916
- 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
- 2020Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languagescited by 719
- 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 656
- 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 629
- 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 568
19 more
- 2019Is Attention Interpretable?cited by 387
- 2019Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Settingcited by 346
- 2019Measuring Bias in Contextualized Word Representationscited by 275
- 2016Visualizing the Effects of Predictor Variables in Black Box Supervised Learning Modelscited by 212
- 2017Learning Explanatory Rules from Noisy Datacited by 210
- 2018Breaking NLI Systems with Sentences that Require Simple Lexical Inferencescited by 134
- 2019Learning to Deceive with Attention-Based Explanationscited by 111
- 2018Attention Branch Network: Learning of Attention Mechanism for Visual Explanationcited by 108
- 2018Boolean Decision Rules via Column Generationcited by 79
- 2016A Thorough Examination of the CNN/Daily Mail Reading Comprehension Taskcited by 71
- 2019SemEval-2010 Task 8: Multi-Way Classification of Semantic Relations Between Pairs of Nominalscited by 63
- 2021Overview of the HASOC track at FIRE 2020: Hate Speech and Offensive Content Identification in Indo-European Languagescited by 38
- 2018Interpreting Recurrent and Attention-Based Neural Models: a Case Study on Natural Language Inferencecited by 26
- 2017Cross-lingual Abstract Meaning Representation Parsingcited by 19
- 2021Overview of the HASOC Subtrack at FIRE 2021: Hate Speech and Offensive Content Identification in English and Indo-Aryan Languagescited by 17
- 2017Crowdsourcing Ground Truth for Medical Relation Extractioncited by 9
- 2019HEIDL: Learning Linguistic Expressions with Deep Learning and Human-in-the-Loopcited by 7
- 2021GrASP: A Library for Extracting and Exploring Human-Interpretable Textual Patternscited by 6
- 2018Does it care what you asked? Understanding Importance of Verbs in Deep Learning QA Systemcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.