mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Crowd-powered Face Manipulation Detection: Fusing Human Examiner Decisions

arXiv 2201.13084 ↗First posted 31 Jan 2022cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We investigate the potential of fusing human examiner decisions for the task of digital face manipulation detection. To this end, various decision fusion methods are proposed incorporating the examiners' decision confidence, experience level, and their time to take a decision. Conducted experiments are based on a psychophysical evaluation of digital face image manipulation detection capabilities of humans in which different manipulation techniques were applied, i.e. face morphing, face swapping and retouching. The decisions of 223 participants were fused to simulate crowds of up to seven human examiners. Experimental results reveal that (1) despite the moderate detection performance achieved by single human examiners, a high accuracy can be obtained through decision fusion and (2) a weighted fusion which takes the examiners' decision confidence into account yields the most competitive detection performance.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2022.

Builds on

7 of 21 references.

References · 7

  1. 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,095
  2. 2020DeeperForensics-1.0: A Large-Scale Dataset for Real-World Face Forgery Detectioncited by 251
  3. 2020DeepFakes and Beyond: A Survey of Face Manipulation and Fake Detectioncited by 231
  4. 2020Media Forensics and DeepFakes: an overviewcited by 208
  5. 2021Deepfake Detection by Human Crowds, Machines, and Machine-informed Crowdscited by 58
  6. 2020Deepfake detection: humans vs. machinescited by 14
  7. 2022Psychophysical Evaluation of Human Performance in Detecting Digital Face Image Manipulationscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.