mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Robustness of Quality Measures for GANs

arXiv 2201.13019 ↗First posted 31 Jan 2022cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This work evaluates the robustness of quality measures of generative models such as Inception Score (IS) and Fr'echet Inception Distance (FID). Analogous to the vulnerability of deep models against a variety of adversarial attacks, we show that such metrics can also be manipulated by additive pixel perturbations. Our experiments indicate that one can generate a distribution of images with very high scores but low perceptual quality. Conversely, one can optimize for small imperceptible perturbations that, when added to real world images, deteriorate their scores. We further extend our evaluation to generative models themselves, including the state of the art network StyleGANv2. We show the vulnerability of both the generative model and the FID against additive perturbations in the latent space. Finally, we show that the FID can be robustified by simply replacing the standard Inception with a robust Inception. We validate the effectiveness of the robustified metric through extensive experiments, showing it is more robust against manipulation.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2022.

Builds on

22 of 32 references.

References · 22

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  3. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
  4. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  5. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  6. 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,580
  7. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  8. 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,938
  9. 2018Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesiscited by 2,609
  10. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,539
  11. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
  12. 2021Alias-Free Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,181
10 more
  1. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
  2. 2017Are GANs Created Equal? A Large-Scale Studycited by 267
  3. 2018A Note on the Inception Scorecited by 225
  4. 2018Pros and Cons of GAN Evaluation Measurescited by 224
  5. 2019Effectively Unbiased FID and Inception Score and where to find themcited by 161
  6. 2017On the Robustness of Semantic Segmentation Models to Adversarial Attackscited by 126
  7. 2018An empirical study on evaluation metrics of generative adversarial networkscited by 81
  8. 2018How good is my GAN?cited by 74
  9. 2021PointGuard: Provably Robust 3D Point Cloud Classificationcited by 49
  10. 2019Adversarial Robustness of Flow-Based Generative Modelscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 5; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

11 papers.