Debiased-CAM to mitigate systematic error with faithful visual explanations of machine learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Model explanations such as saliency maps can improve user trust in AI by highlighting important features for a prediction. However, these become distorted and misleading when explaining predictions of images that are subject to systematic error (bias). Furthermore, the distortions persist despite model fine-tuning on images biased by different factors (blur, color temperature, day/night). We present Debiased-CAM to recover explanation faithfulness across various bias types and levels by training a multi-input, multi-task model with auxiliary tasks for explanation and bias level predictions. In simulation studies, the approach not only enhanced prediction accuracy, but also generated highly faithful explanations about these predictions as if the images were unbiased. In user studies, debiased explanations improved user task performance, perceived truthfulness and perceived helpfulness. Debiased training can provide a versatile platform for robust performance and explanation faithfulness for a wide range of applications with data biases.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 59 of its 112 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2022.
Builds on
59 of 112 references.
References · 59
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
- 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,447
38 more
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
- 2016Paying More Attention to Attention: Improving the Performance of Convolutional Neural Networks via Attention Transfercited by 1,059
- 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
- 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
- 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 936
- 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 897
- 2014Show and Tell: A Neural Image Caption Generatorcited by 877
- 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 703
- 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 611
- 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 575
- 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 443
- 2020Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performancecited by 396
- 2016Visual Dialogcited by 377
- 2017DeblurGAN: Blind Motion Deblurring Using Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 366
- 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 293
- 2020Effect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Makingcited by 281
- 2018Manipulating and Measuring Model Interpretabilitycited by 256
- 2018Techniques for Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 237
- 2019Explanations can be manipulated and geometry is to blamecited by 215
- 2016What do different evaluation metrics tell us about saliency models?cited by 184
- 2018Tell Me Where to Look: Guided Attention Inference Networkcited by 168
- 2017Interpretable Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 161
- 2016Improving the Robustness of Deep Neural Networks via Stability Trainingcited by 156
- 2018Visual Interpretability for Deep Learning: a Surveycited by 155
- 2020Making deep neural networks right for the right scientific reasons by interacting with their explanationscited by 141
- 2019Taking a HINT: Leveraging Explanations to Make Vision and Language Models More Groundedcited by 127
- 2021Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systemscited by 124
- 2021What Do We Want From Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)? -- A Stakeholder Perspective on XAI and a Conceptual Model Guiding Interdisciplinary XAI Researchcited by 119
- 2018Visual Analytics in Deep Learning: An Interrogative Survey for the Next Frontierscited by 117
- 2019"How do I fool you?": Manipulating User Trust via Misleading Black Box Explanationscited by 111
- 2020Evaluating Saliency Map Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networks: A User Studycited by 86
- 2018Interpretable Deep Learning under Firecited by 74
- 2020A Case for Humans-in-the-Loop: Decisions in the Presence of Erroneous Algorithmic Scorescited by 74
- 2019Summit: Scaling Deep Learning Interpretability by Visualizing Activation and Attribution Summarizationscited by 72
- 2019An Evaluation of the Human-Interpretability of Explanationcited by 71
50 most cited of 59 All 59 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.