Spherical Poisson Point Process Intensity Function Modeling and Estimation with Measure Transport
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent years have seen an increased interest in the application of methods and techniques commonly associated with machine learning and artificial intelligence to spatial statistics. Here, in a celebration of the ten-year anniversary of the journal Spatial Statistics, we bring together normalizing flows, commonly used for density function estimation in machine learning, and spherical point processes, a topic of particular interest to the journal's readership, to present a new approach for modeling non-homogeneous Poisson process intensity functions on the sphere. The central idea of this framework is to build, and estimate, a flexible bijective map that transforms the underlying intensity function of interest on the sphere into a simpler, reference, intensity function, also on the sphere. Map estimation can be done efficiently using automatic differentiation and stochastic gradient descent, and uncertainty quantification can be done straightforwardly via nonparametric bootstrap. We investigate the viability of the proposed method in a simulation study, and illustrate its use in a proof-of-concept study where we model the intensity of cyclone events in the North Pacific Ocean. Our experiments reveal that normalizing flows present a flexible and straightforward way to model intensity functions on spheres, but that their potential to yield a good fit depends on the architecture of the bijective map, which can be difficult to establish in practice.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jan 2022.
Builds on
23 of 45 references.
References · 23
- 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,161
- 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,315
- 2017Masked Autoregressive Flow for Density Estimationcited by 680
- 2016On the Expressive Power of Deep Neural Networkscited by 302
- 2018Neural Autoregressive Flowscited by 207
- 2015The Power of Depth for Feedforward Neural Networkscited by 181
- 2020Riemannian Continuous Normalizing Flowscited by 143
- 2020Normalizing Flows on Tori and Spherescited by 117
- 2020Neural Spatio-Temporal Point Processescited by 92
- 2016Normalizing Flows on Riemannian Manifoldscited by 68
- 2019Sum-of-Squares Polynomial Flowcited by 62
- 2021Neural Networks for Parameter Estimation in Intractable Modelscited by 28
11 more
- 2020Fast covariance parameter estimation of spatial Gaussian process models using neural networkscited by 25
- 2019Deep Compositional Spatial Modelscited by 20
- 2020DeepKriging: Spatially Dependent Deep Neural Networks for Spatial Predictioncited by 20
- 2017Bayesian Recurrent Neural Network Models for Forecasting and Quantifying Uncertainty in Spatial-Temporal Datacited by 17
- 2019Deep Integro-Difference Equation Models for Spatio-Temporal Forecastingcited by 15
- 2021Scalable Bayesian transport maps for high-dimensional non-Gaussian spatial fieldscited by 9
- 2020Deep Gaussian Markov Random Fieldscited by 8
- 2020Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Collective Animal Movementcited by 3
- 2016Determinantal point process models on the spherecited by 2
- 2020Non-Homogeneous Poisson Process Intensity Modeling and Estimation using Measure Transportcited by 2
- 2021Compositionally-warped additive mixed modeling for a wide variety of non-Gaussian spatial datacited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.