mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DeepKriging: Spatially Dependent Deep Neural Networks for Spatial Prediction

arXiv 2007.11972 ↗First posted 23 Jul 2020stat.ML cs.LG stat.APcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In spatial statistics, a common objective is to predict values of a spatial process at unobserved locations by exploiting spatial dependence. Kriging provides the best linear unbiased predictor using covariance functions and is often associated with Gaussian processes. However, when considering non-linear prediction for non-Gaussian and categorical data, the Kriging prediction is no longer optimal, and the associated variance is often overly optimistic. Although deep neural networks (DNNs) are widely used for general classification and prediction, they have not been studied thoroughly for data with spatial dependence. In this work, we propose a novel DNN structure for spatial prediction, where the spatial dependence is captured by adding an embedding layer of spatial coordinates with basis functions. We show in theory and simulation studies that the proposed DeepKriging method has a direct link to Kriging in the Gaussian case, and it has multiple advantages over Kriging for non-Gaussian and non-stationary data, i.e., it provides non-linear predictions and thus has smaller approximation errors, it does not require operations on covariance matrices and thus is scalable for large datasets, and with sufficiently many hidden neurons, it provides the optimal prediction in terms of model capacity. We further explore the possibility of quantifying prediction uncertainties based on density prediction without assuming any data distribution. Finally, we apply the method to predicting PM2.5 concentrations across the continental United States.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 5; 2024: 5; 2025: 6; 2026: 2.

20 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022Statistical Deep Learning for Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Datacited by 15
  2. 2023Spatio-temporal DeepKriging for Interpolation and Probabilistic Forecastingcited by 13
  3. 2023Neural networks for geospatial datacited by 11
  4. 2024Spatial Conformal Inference through Localized Quantile Regressioncited by 6
  5. 2024Dynamical system prediction from sparse observations using deep neural networks with Voronoi tessellation and physics constraintcited by 5
  6. 2023Bivariate DeepKriging for Large-scale Spatial Interpolation of Wind Fieldscited by 2
  7. 2025Kriging prior Regression: A Case for Kriging-Based Spatial Features with TabPFN in Soil Mappingcited by 2
  8. 2022Spherical Poisson Point Process Intensity Function Modeling and Estimation with Measure Transportcited by 1
  9. 2023Random forests for binary geospatial datacited by 1
  10. 2023Spatial Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 1
  11. 2024A Hybrid Framework for Spatial Interpolation: Merging Data-driven with Domain Knowledgecited by 1
  12. 2025A2 Copula-Driven Spatial Bayesian Neural Network For Modeling Non-Gaussian Dependence: A Simulation Studycited by 1
8 more
  1. 2024Spatial Transfer Learning with Simple MLPcited by 0
  2. 2024A Subsampling Based Neural Network for Spatial Datacited by 0
  3. 2025Summary Statistics of Large-scale Model Outputs for Observation-corrected Outputscited by 0
  4. 2025Modeling nonstationary spatial processes with normalizing flowscited by 0
  5. 2025Leveraging Teleconnections with Physics-Informed Graph Attention Networks for Long-Range Extreme Rainfall Forecasting in Thailandcited by 0
  6. 2025Deep classifier kriging for probabilistic spatial prediction of air quality indexcited by 0
  7. 2026Permutation-preserving Functions and Neural Vecchia Covariance Kernelscited by 0
  8. 2026Zhinv: Real-time hub-height wind field reconstruction using only local sparse observationscited by 0