What can we learn from misclassified ImageNet images?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding the patterns of misclassified ImageNet images is particularly important, as it could guide us to design deep neural networks (DNN) that generalize better. However, the richness of ImageNet imposes difficulties for researchers to visually find any useful patterns of misclassification. Here, to help find these patterns, we propose "Superclassing ImageNet dataset". It is a subset of ImageNet which consists of 10 superclasses, each containing 7-116 related subclasses (e.g., 52 bird types, 116 dog types). By training neural networks on this dataset, we found that: (i) Misclassifications are rarely across superclasses, but mainly among subclasses within a superclass. (ii) Ensemble networks trained each only on subclasses of a given superclass perform better than the same network trained on all subclasses of all superclasses. Hence, we propose a two-stage Super-Sub framework, and demonstrate that: (i) The framework improves overall classification performance by 3.3%, by first inferring a superclass using a generalist superclass-level network, and then using a specialized network for final subclass-level classification. (ii) Although the total parameter storage cost increases to a factor N+1 for N superclasses compared to using a single network, with finetuning, delta and quantization aware training techniques this can be reduced to 0.2N+1. Another advantage of this efficient implementation is that the memory cost on the GPU during inference is equivalent to using only one network. The reason is we initiate each subclass-level network through addition of small parameter variations (deltas) to the superclass-level network. (iii) Finally, our framework promises to be more scalable and generalizable than the common alternative of simply scaling up a vanilla network in size, since very large networks often suffer from overfitting and gradient vanishing.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jan 2022.
Builds on
9 of 28 references.
References · 9
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
- 2018Exploring the Limits of Weakly Supervised Pretrainingcited by 605
- 2021Dynamic Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 408
- 2017Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: Full Training or Fine Tuning?cited by 221
- 2017A Study and Comparison of Human and Deep Learning Recognition Performance Under Visual Distortionscited by 108
- 2019Overfitting Mechanism and Avoidance in Deep Neural Networkscited by 30
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023ImageNet-Hard: The Hardest Images Remaining from a Study of the Power of Zoom and Spatial Biases in Image Classification
- 2026Doomed to Re-Annotate, Forever: The ImageNet Story
- 2023Multi-Class Unlearning for Image Classification via Weight Filtering
- 2021What Do Deep Nets Learn? Class-wise Patterns Revealed in the Input Space
- 2024EncodeNet: A Framework for Boosting DNN Accuracy with Entropy-driven Generalized Converting Autoencoder
- 2023A framework for benchmarking class-out-of-distribution detection and its application to ImageNet
- 2024Revisiting MLLMs: An In-Depth Analysis of Image Classification Abilities
- 2025Unsupervised Learning for Class Distribution Mismatch