mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Do not rug on me: Zero-dimensional Scam Detection

arXiv 2201.07220 ↗First posted 16 Jan 2022cs.CR cs.LG q-fin.STcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Uniswap, like other DEXs, has gained much attention this year because it is a non-custodial and publicly verifiable exchange that allows users to trade digital assets without trusted third parties. However, its simplicity and lack of regulation also makes it easy to execute initial coin offering scams by listing non-valuable tokens. This method of performing scams is known as rug pull, a phenomenon that already existed in traditional finance but has become more relevant in DeFi. Various projects such as [34,37] have contributed to detecting rug pulls in EVM compatible chains. However, the first longitudinal and academic step to detecting and characterizing scam tokens on Uniswap was made in [44]. The authors collected all the transactions related to the Uniswap V2 exchange and proposed a machine learning algorithm to label tokens as scams. However, the algorithm is only valuable for detecting scams accurately after they have been executed. This paper increases their data set by 20K tokens and proposes a new methodology to label tokens as scams. After manually analyzing the data, we devised a theoretical classification of different malicious maneuvers in Uniswap protocol. We propose various machine-learning-based algorithms with new relevant features related to the token propagation and smart contract heuristics to detect potential rug pulls before they occur. In general, the models proposed achieved similar results. The best model obtained an accuracy of 0.9936, recall of 0.9540, and precision of 0.9838 in distinguishing non-malicious tokens from scams prior to the malicious maneuver.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jan 2022.

Builds on

20 of 49 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  4. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  5. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
  6. 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 725
  7. 2019Slither: A Static Analysis Framework For Smart Contractscited by 88
  8. 2019Who Are the Phishers? Phishing Scam Detection on Ethereum via Network Embeddingcited by 38
  9. 2021SoK: Decentralized Finance (DeFi)cited by 23
  10. 2017Dissecting Ponzi schemes on Ethereum: identification, analysis, and impactcited by 19
  11. 2019The Art of The Scam: Demystifying Honeypots in Ethereum Smart Contractscited by 13
  12. 2019Flash Boys 2.0: Frontrunning, Transaction Reordering, and Consensus Instability in Decentralized Exchangescited by 11
8 more
  1. 2019An analysis of Uniswap marketscited by 11
  2. 2019Dissecting Ethereum Blockchain Analytics: What We Learn from Topology and Geometry of Ethereum Graphcited by 11
  3. 2020High-Frequency Trading on Decentralized On-Chain Exchangescited by 10
  4. 2021Topological Anomaly Detection in Dynamic Multilayer Blockchain Networkscited by 9
  5. 2021SoK: Oracles from the Ground Truth to Market Manipulationcited by 7
  6. 2020Tracing Cryptocurrency Scams: Clustering Replicated Advance-Fee and Phishing Websitescited by 5
  7. 2021Clockwork Finance: Automated Analysis of Economic Security in Smart Contractscited by 5
  8. 2020Don't Fish in Troubled Waters! Characterizing Coronavirus-themed Cryptocurrency Scamscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.