Invariant Representation Driven Neural Classifier for Anti-QCD Jet Tagging
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We leverage representation learning and the inductive bias in neural-net-based Standard Model jet classification tasks, to detect non-QCD signal jets. In establishing the framework for classification-based anomaly detection in jet physics, we demonstrate that, with a well-calibrated and powerful enough feature extractor, a well-trained mass-decorrelated supervised Standard Model neural jet classifier can serve as a strong generic anti-QCD jet tagger for effectively reducing the QCD background. Imposing data-augmented mass-invariance (and thus decoupling the dominant factor) not only facilitates background estimation, but also induces more substructure-aware representation learning. We are able to reach excellent tagging efficiencies for all the test signals considered. In the best case, we reach a background rejection rate of 51 and a significance improvement factor of 3.6 at 50 % signal acceptance, with the jet mass decorrelated. This study indicates that supervised Standard Model jet classifiers have great potential in general new physics searches.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jan 2022.
Builds on
33 of 64 references.
References · 33
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
- 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,618
- 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,472
- 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 939
- 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 555
- 2019Likelihood Ratios for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 451
- 2018Do Deep Generative Models Know What They Don't Know?cited by 443
21 more
- 2020Simple and Principled Uncertainty Estimation with Deterministic Deep Learning via Distance Awarenesscited by 389
- 2021Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 387
- 2018Why ReLU networks yield high-confidence predictions far away from the training data and how to mitigate the problemcited by 323
- 2018Learning Confidence for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Neural Networkscited by 245
- 2018A disciplined approach to neural network hyper-parameters: Part 1 -- learning rate, batch size, momentum, and weight decaycited by 223
- 2021A Simple Fix to Mahalanobis Distance for Improving Near-OOD Detectioncited by 206
- 2017Super-Convergence: Very Fast Training of Neural Networks Using Large Learning Ratescited by 196
- 2020Contrastive Training for Improved Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 186
- 2020Anomaly Detection with Density Estimationcited by 71
- 2019ParticleNet: Jet Tagging via Particle Cloudscited by 64
- 2018Variational Autoencoders for New Physics Mining at the Large Hadron Collidercited by 40
- 2020Perfect density models cannot guarantee anomaly detectioncited by 39
- 2020Uncertainty Estimation Using a Single Deep Deterministic Neural Networkcited by 37
- 2021Autoencoders for unsupervised anomaly detection in high energy physicscited by 32
- 2020Revisiting One-vs-All Classifiers for Predictive Uncertainty and Out-of-Distribution Detection in Neural Networkscited by 31
- 2018Novelty Detection Meets Collider Physicscited by 20
- 2021Better Latent Spaces for Better Autoencoderscited by 20
- 2020One Versus all for deep Neural Network Incertitude (OVNNI) quantificationcited by 17
- 2020Unsupervised in-distribution anomaly detection of new physics through conditional density estimationcited by 12
- 2019Sim-to-Real Domain Adaptation For High Energy Physicscited by 4
- 2019Interpretability Study on Deep Learning for Jet Physics at the Large Hadron Collidercited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Anomalies, Representations, and Self-Supervisioncited by 10
- 2023Versatile Energy-Based Probabilistic Models for High Energy Physicscited by 2
- 2024Robust Anomaly Detection for Particle Physics Using Multi-Background Representation Learningcited by 1
- 2022Bridging Machine Learning and Sciences: Opportunities and Challengescited by 0
- 2024Robust Anomaly Detection for Particle Physics Using Multi-Background Representation Learning16 Jan 2024
- 2023Versatile Energy-Based Probabilistic Models for High Energy Physics1 Feb 2023
- 2023Anomalies, Representations, and Self-Supervision11 Jan 2023
- 2022Bridging Machine Learning and Sciences: Opportunities and Challenges24 Oct 2022