Understanding Political Polarization via Jointly Modeling Users, Connections and Multimodal Contents on Heterogeneous Graphs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding political polarization on social platforms is important as public opinions may become increasingly extreme when they are circulated in homogeneous communities, thus potentially causing damage in the real world. Automatically detecting the political ideology of social media users can help better understand political polarization. However, it is challenging due to the scarcity of ideology labels, complexity of multimodal contents, and cost of time-consuming data collection process. In this study, we adopt a heterogeneous graph neural network to jointly model user characteristics, multimodal post contents as well as user-item relations in a bipartite graph to learn a comprehensive and effective user embedding without requiring ideology labels. We apply our framework to online discussions about economy and public health topics. The learned embeddings are then used to detect political ideology and understand political polarization. Our framework outperforms the unimodal, early/late fusion baselines, and homogeneous GNN frameworks by a margin of at least 9% absolute gain in the area under the receiver operating characteristic on two social media datasets. More importantly, our work does not require a time-consuming data collection process, which allows faster detection and in turn allows the policy makers to conduct analysis and design policies in time to respond to crises. We also show that our framework learns meaningful user embeddings and can help better understand political polarization. Notable differences in user descriptions, topics, images, and levels of retweet/quote activities are observed. Our framework for decoding user-content interaction shows wide applicability in understanding political polarization. Furthermore, it can be extended to user-item bipartite information networks for other applications such as content and product recommendation.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Jan 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 6; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2023ConGraT: Self-Supervised Contrastive Pretraining for Joint Graph and Text Embeddingscited by 32
- 2023Mixture of Weak & Strong Experts on Graphscited by 7
- 2023Multi-Modal Discussion Transformer: Integrating Text, Images and Graph Transformers to Detect Hate Speech on Social Mediacited by 6
- 2024X-Reflect: Cross-Reflection Prompting for Multimodal Recommendationcited by 6
- 2023Computational Assessment of Hyperpartisanship in News Titlescited by 4
- 2026ERASE: EaRly bAckpropagation SchEdule for Faster Training of Modern Recommendation Systemscited by 2
- 2023Bias or Diversity? Unraveling Fine-Grained Thematic Discrepancy in U.S. News Headlinescited by 1
- 2023Modeling Political Orientation of Social Media Posts: An Extended Analysiscited by 0
- 2026ERASE: EaRly bAckpropagation SchEdule for Faster Training of Modern Recommendation Systems19 Aug 2026
- 2024X-Reflect: Cross-Reflection Prompting for Multimodal Recommendation27 Aug 2024
- 2023Modeling Political Orientation of Social Media Posts: An Extended Analysis21 Nov 2023
- 2023Mixture of Weak & Strong Experts on Graphs9 Nov 2023
- 2023Multi-Modal Discussion Transformer: Integrating Text, Images and Graph Transformers to Detect Hate Speech on Social Media18 Jul 2023
- 2023ConGraT: Self-Supervised Contrastive Pretraining for Joint Graph and Text Embeddings23 May 2023
- 2023Bias or Diversity? Unraveling Fine-Grained Thematic Discrepancy in U.S. News Headlines28 Mar 2023
- 2023Computational Assessment of Hyperpartisanship in News Titles16 Jan 2023