mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Neural Circuit Architectural Priors for Embodied Control

arXiv 2201.05242 ↗First posted 13 Jan 2022cs.LG cs.NE cs.ROcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial neural networks for motor control usually adopt generic architectures like fully connected MLPs. While general, these tabula rasa architectures rely on large amounts of experience to learn, are not easily transferable to new bodies, and have internal dynamics that are difficult to interpret. In nature, animals are born with highly structured connectivity in their nervous systems shaped by evolution; this innate circuitry acts synergistically with learning mechanisms to provide inductive biases that enable most animals to function well soon after birth and learn efficiently. Convolutional networks inspired by visual circuitry have encoded useful biases for vision. However, it is unknown the extent to which ANN architectures inspired by neural circuitry can yield useful biases for other AI domains. In this work, we ask what advantages biologically inspired ANN architecture can provide in the domain of motor control. Specifically, we translate C. elegans locomotion circuits into an ANN model controlling a simulated Swimmer agent. On a locomotion task, our architecture achieves good initial performance and asymptotic performance comparable with MLPs, while dramatically improving data efficiency and requiring orders of magnitude fewer parameters. Our architecture is interpretable and transfers to new body designs. An ablation analysis shows that constrained excitation/inhibition is crucial for learning, while weight initialization contributes to good initial performance. Our work demonstrates several advantages of biologically inspired ANN architecture and encourages future work in more complex embodied control.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jan 2022.

Builds on

19 of 59 references.

References · 19

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
  4. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  5. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
  6. 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
  7. 2015End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policiescited by 847
  8. 2017Evolution Strategies as a Scalable Alternative to Reinforcement Learningcited by 555
  9. 2020dm_control: Software and Tasks for Continuous Controlcited by 368
  10. 2020Learning Agile Robotic Locomotion Skills by Imitating Animalscited by 229
  11. 2017Emergence of Locomotion Behaviours in Rich Environmentscited by 159
  12. 2019A Review of Robot Learning for Manipulation: Challenges, Representations, and Algorithmscited by 136
7 more
  1. 2018Neural probabilistic motor primitives for humanoid controlcited by 96
  2. 2020Convolutional Neural Networks as a Model of the Visual System: Past, Present, and Futurecited by 83
  3. 2016Learning and Transfer of Modulated Locomotor Controllerscited by 59
  4. 2019Policies Modulating Trajectory Generatorscited by 47
  5. 2017Deep Learning in Robotics: A Review of Recent Researchcited by 42
  6. 2019Deep neuroethology of a virtual rodentcited by 22
  7. 2020Tonic: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Library for Fast Prototyping and Benchmarkingcited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2.

3 papers.