Biaffine Discourse Dependency Parsing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We provide a study of using the biaffine model for neural discourse dependency parsing and achieve significant performance improvement compared with the baseline parsers. We compare the Eisner algorithm and the Chu-Liu-Edmonds algorithm in the task and find that using the Chu-Liu-Edmonds algorithm generates deeper trees and achieves better performance. We also evaluate the structure of the output of the parser with average maximum path length and average proportion of leaf nodes and find that the dependency trees generated by the parser are close to the gold trees. As the corpus allows non-projective structures, we analyze the complexity of non-projectivity of the corpus and find that the dependency structures in this corpus have gap degree at most one and edge degree at most one.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jan 2022.
Builds on
7 of 35 references.
References · 7
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2016Deep Biaffine Attention for Neural Dependency Parsingcited by 334
- 2016Simple and Accurate Dependency Parsing Using Bidirectional LSTM Feature Representationscited by 55
- 2020Efficient Second-Order TreeCRF for Neural Dependency Parsingcited by 48
- 2017Neural Discourse Structure for Text Categorizationcited by 24
- 2018SciDTB: Discourse Dependency TreeBank for Scientific Abstractscited by 24
- 2019Evaluating Discourse in Structured Text Representationscited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.