mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluating Discourse in Structured Text Representations

arXiv 1906.01472 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2019cs.CLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Discourse structure is integral to understanding a text and is helpful in many NLP tasks. Learning latent representations of discourse is an attractive alternative to acquiring expensive labeled discourse data. Liu and Lapata (2018) propose a structured attention mechanism for text classification that derives a tree over a text, akin to an RST discourse tree. We examine this model in detail, and evaluate on additional discourse-relevant tasks and datasets, in order to assess whether the structured attention improves performance on the end task and whether it captures a text's discourse structure. We find the learned latent trees have little to no structure and instead focus on lexical cues; even after obtaining more structured trees with proposed model modifications, the trees are still far from capturing discourse structure when compared to discourse dependency trees from an existing discourse parser. Finally, ablation studies show the structured attention provides little benefit, sometimes even hurting performance.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 5; 2023: 2.

9 papers.