Image quality measurements and denoising using Fourier Ring Correlations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Image quality is a nebulous concept with different meanings to different people. To quantify image quality a relative difference is typically calculated between a corrupted image and a ground truth image. But what metric should we use for measuring this difference? Ideally, the metric should perform well for both natural and scientific images. The structural similarity index (SSIM) is a good measure for how humans perceive image similarities, but is not sensitive to differences that are scientifically meaningful in microscopy. In electron and super-resolution microscopy, the Fourier Ring Correlation (FRC) is often used, but is little known outside of these fields. Here we show that the FRC can equally well be applied to natural images, e.g. the Google Open Images dataset. We then define a loss function based on the FRC, show that it is analytically differentiable, and use it to train a U-net for denoising of images. This FRC-based loss function allows the network to train faster and achieve similar or better results than when using L1- or L2- based losses. We also investigate the properties and limitations of neural network denoising with the FRC analysis.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jan 2022.
Builds on
13 of 40 references.
References · 13
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2016Beyond a Gaussian Denoiser: Residual Learning of Deep CNN for Image Denoisingcited by 1,352
- 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,321
- 2017Deep Image Priorcited by 1,097
- 2018Noise2Noise: Learning Image Restoration without Clean Datacited by 526
- 2017FFDNet: Toward a Fast and Flexible Solution for CNN based Image Denoisingcited by 509
- 2018Noise2Void - Learning Denoising from Single Noisy Imagescited by 359
- 2019Noise2Self: Blind Denoising by Self-Supervisioncited by 274
- 2019High-Quality Self-Supervised Deep Image Denoisingcited by 161
- 2019Probabilistic Noise2Void: Unsupervised Content-Aware Denoisingcited by 51
- 2015Loss Functions for Neural Networks for Image Processingcited by 41
- 2019Denoising and Regularization via Exploiting the Structural Bias of Convolutional Generatorscited by 40
1 more
- 2019Fully Unsupervised Probabilistic Noise2Voidcited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.