mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Boosting the Accuracy of Non-Latin Scene Text Recognition

arXiv 2201.03185 ↗First posted 10 Jan 2022cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Scene-text recognition is remarkably better in Latin languages than the non-Latin languages due to several factors like multiple fonts, simplistic vocabulary statistics, updated data generation tools, and writing systems. This paper examines the possible reasons for low accuracy by comparing English datasets with non-Latin languages. We compare various features like the size (width and height) of the word images and word length statistics. Over the last decade, generating synthetic datasets with powerful deep learning techniques has tremendously improved scene-text recognition. Several controlled experiments are performed on English, by varying the number of (i) fonts to create the synthetic data and (ii) created word images. We discover that these factors are critical for the scene-text recognition systems. The English synthetic datasets utilize over 1400 fonts while Arabic and other non-Latin datasets utilize less than 100 fonts for data generation. Since some of these languages are a part of different regions, we garner additional fonts through a region-based search to improve the scene-text recognition models in Arabic and Devanagari. We improve the Word Recognition Rates (WRRs) on Arabic MLT-17 and MLT-19 datasets by 24.54% and 2.32% compared to previous works or baselines. We achieve WRR gains of 7.88% and 3.72% for IIIT-ILST and MLT-19 Devanagari datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jan 2022.

Builds on

13 of 32 references.

References · 13

  1. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,512
  2. 2015An End-to-End Trainable Neural Network for Image-based Sequence Recognition and Its Application to Scene Text Recognitioncited by 520
  3. 2016Synthetic Data for Text Localisation in Natural Imagescited by 396
  4. 2016COCO-Text: Dataset and Benchmark for Text Detection and Recognition in Natural Imagescited by 236
  5. 2014Synthetic Data and Artificial Neural Networks for Natural Scene Text Recognitioncited by 214
  6. 2017Total-Text: A Comprehensive Dataset for Scene Text Detection and Recognitioncited by 162
  7. 2019ICDAR2019 Robust Reading Challenge on Multi-lingual Scene Text Detection and Recognition -- RRC-MLT-2019cited by 139
  8. 2019ICDAR 2019 Robust Reading Challenge on Reading Chinese Text on Signboardcited by 128
  9. 2019ICDAR 2019 Competition on Large-scale Street View Text with Partial Labeling -- RRC-LSVTcited by 122
  10. 2017ICDAR2017 Competition on Reading Chinese Text in the Wild (RCTW-17)cited by 105
  11. 2018E2E-MLT - an Unconstrained End-to-End Method for Multi-Language Scene Textcited by 21
  12. 2021Benchmarking Scene Text Recognition in Devanagari, Telugu and Malayalamcited by 11
1 more
  1. 2018Mask R-CNN with Pyramid Attention Network for Scene Text Detectioncited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.